PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWHFX vs. GMXAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWHFX vs. GMXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) and Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund (GMXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWHFX achieves a 18.47% return, which is significantly higher than GMXAX's 13.94% return. Over the past 10 years, NWHFX has outperformed GMXAX with an annualized return of 10.65%, while GMXAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.42% annualized return.


NWHFX

1D
0.90%
1M
3.29%
YTD
18.47%
6M
18.23%
1Y
37.16%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
8.53%
10Y*
10.65%

GMXAX

1D
0.88%
1M
3.89%
YTD
13.94%
6M
14.16%
1Y
24.97%
3Y*
15.19%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
9.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWHFX vs. GMXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWHFX
Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund
18.47%9.95%10.23%15.78%-12.91%36.15%8.82%21.18%-16.17%4.04%
GMXAX
Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund
13.94%6.84%12.15%15.89%-13.45%24.33%12.79%25.35%-10.65%2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between NWHFX and GMXAX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2013

0.93

The correlation between NWHFX and GMXAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWHFX vs. GMXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWHFX
NWHFX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NWHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
NWHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

GMXAX
GMXAX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GMXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GMXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWHFX vs. GMXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) and Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund (GMXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NWHFXGMXAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.30

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.60

3.02

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.12

10.94

+5.18

NWHFX vs. GMXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWHFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the GMXAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWHFX and GMXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NWHFXGMXAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

1.73

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.39

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.44

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.41

+0.04

Drawdowns

NWHFX vs. GMXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWHFX drawdown since its inception was -47.51%, smaller than the maximum GMXAX drawdown of -55.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHFX and GMXAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWHFXGMXAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.51%

-55.64%

+8.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-8.83%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.68%

-24.21%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.68%

-24.21%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.51%

-42.22%

-5.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-8.06%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.43%

-0.01%

Volatility

NWHFX vs. GMXAX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) and Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund (GMXAX) have volatilities of 4.49% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWHFXGMXAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

4.42%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.38%

11.29%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.64%

15.42%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.56%

19.70%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.79%

21.31%

+1.48%

NWHFX vs. GMXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWHFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GMXAX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWHFX vs. GMXAX - Dividend Comparison

NWHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.78%, less than GMXAX's 11.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMXAX
Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund
11.44%12.93%11.73%6.17%9.58%12.52%3.18%5.18%23.21%0.85%9.60%13.94%
NWHFX
Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund
9.78%11.48%13.85%1.38%3.31%4.98%0.83%0.65%15.39%11.63%0.62%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


NWHFX and GMXAX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NWHFX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to GMXAX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWHFX dropped -47.51% vs GMXAX's -55.64%.

NWHFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWHFX and GMXAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer