NWHFX vs. NWHVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) and Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX).
NWHFX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on May 30, 2001. NWHVX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Jan 4, 1999.
Performance
NWHFX vs. NWHVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NWHFX vs. NWHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWHFX Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund | 3.59% | 9.95% | 10.23% | 15.78% | -12.91% | 36.15% | 8.82% | 21.18% | -16.17% | 4.04% |
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund | -11.40% | -2.38% | 9.89% | 23.84% | -28.32% | 25.03% | 31.17% | 29.96% | -2.97% | 23.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NWHFX achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly higher than NWHVX's -11.40% return. Over the past 10 years, NWHFX has outperformed NWHVX with an annualized return of 9.54%, while NWHVX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.
NWHFX
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- 3.59%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- 1Y
- 22.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
NWHVX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -10.82%
- YTD
- -11.40%
- 6M
- -15.58%
- 1Y
- -11.65%
- 3Y*
- 2.87%
- 5Y*
- 0.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NWHFX vs. NWHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NWHFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NWHVX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NWHFX vs. NWHVX — Risk / Return Rank
NWHFX
NWHVX
NWHFX vs. NWHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) and Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NWHFX | NWHVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | -0.62 | +1.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | -0.81 | +2.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.90 | +0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | -0.72 | +2.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.24 | -2.09 | +8.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NWHFX | NWHVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | -0.62 | +1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.03 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.42 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.41 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between NWHFX and NWHVX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NWHFX vs. NWHVX - Dividend Comparison
NWHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.18%, more than NWHVX's 8.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWHFX Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund | 11.18% | 11.48% | 13.85% | 1.38% | 3.31% | 4.98% | 0.83% | 0.65% | 15.39% | 11.63% | 0.62% | 1.21% |
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund | 8.99% | 7.96% | 11.93% | 16.14% | 36.45% | 34.64% | 6.16% | 18.85% | 38.53% | 11.37% | 8.97% | 13.54% |
Drawdowns
NWHFX vs. NWHVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWHFX drawdown since its inception was -47.51%, which is greater than NWHVX's maximum drawdown of -37.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHFX and NWHVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWHFX | NWHVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.51% | -37.12% | -10.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.22% | -17.82% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.68% | -37.12% | +12.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.51% | -37.12% | -10.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -19.80% | +12.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.44% | -7.74% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 6.13% | -2.80% |
Volatility
NWHFX vs. NWHVX - Volatility Comparison
Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) at 4.60%. This indicates that NWHFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NWHFX | NWHVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 4.60% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | 10.91% | +1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.35% | 18.16% | +2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 19.85% | +0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 19.64% | +3.11% |