NWHFX vs. PYLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NWHFX (Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund) and PYLD (PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both funds - NWHFX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Nationwide, while PYLD is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past year, NWHFX returned 37.16% vs 7.40% for PYLD. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NWHFX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PYLD.

Performance

NWHFX vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWHFX achieves a 18.47% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's 0.95% return.

NWHFX

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 3.29%
• YTD: 18.47%
• 6M: 18.23%
• 1Y: 37.16%
• 3Y*: 19.45%
• 5Y*: 8.53%
• 10Y*: 10.65%

PYLD

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 0.95%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 7.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWHFX vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NWHFX Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund	18.47%	9.95%	10.23%	16.94%
PYLD PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	0.95%	9.57%	7.69%	5.60%

Correlation

The correlation between NWHFX and PYLD is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023	0.33

Return for Risk

NWHFX vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWHFX

NWHFX Risk / Return Rank: 71
NWHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
NWHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
NWHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
NWHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
NWHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

PYLD

PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 66
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWHFX vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NWHFX	PYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	2.42	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	3.56	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.48	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.60	2.29	+2.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.12	10.44	+5.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NWHFX vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWHFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWHFX and PYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NWHFX	PYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	2.42	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	2.04	-1.59

Drawdowns

NWHFX vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWHFX drawdown since its inception was -47.51%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHFX and PYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	NWHFX	PYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.51%	-4.52%	-42.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	-3.25%	-5.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.44%	+0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.35%	-0.65%	-6.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	0.71%	+1.71%

Volatility

NWHFX vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) at 1.24%. This indicates that NWHFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NWHFX	PYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	1.24%	+3.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.38%	2.50%	+8.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.64%	3.08%	+13.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.56%	3.99%	+16.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.79%	3.99%	+18.80%

NWHFX vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWHFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

NWHFX vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

NWHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.78%, more than PYLD's 6.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NWHFX Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund	9.78%	11.48%	13.85%	1.38%	3.31%	4.98%	0.83%	0.65%	15.39%	11.63%	0.62%	1.21%
PYLD PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	6.30%	6.21%	6.40%	2.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NWHFX and PYLD in my portfolio?

NWHFX and PYLD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NWHFX or PYLD?

NWHFX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to PYLD (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWHFX dropped -47.51% vs PYLD's -4.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.