PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWHFX vs. PYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWHFX vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWHFX achieves a 22.58% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's 0.98% return.


NWHFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.64%
6M
13.92%
YTD
22.58%
1Y
39.98%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
10.57%
ALL TIME*
9.73%

PYLD

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.76%
6M
0.38%
YTD
0.98%
1Y
4.94%
3Y*
7.93%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$87.11M$100.81M$103.51M

NWHFX vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NWHFX
Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund
22.58%9.95%10.23%16.01%
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
0.98%9.57%7.69%5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between NWHFX and PYLD is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023

0.34

The correlation between NWHFX and PYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWHFX vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NWHFX
NWHFX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NWHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
NWHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

PYLD
PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NWHFX vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NWHFXPYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.30

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

1.53

+2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.23

6.57

+9.65

NWHFX vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWHFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWHFX and PYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NWHFX vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWHFX drawdown since its inception was -47.51%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHFX and PYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWHFXPYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.51%

-4.52%

-42.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-3.25%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.68%

-3.88%

-20.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-0.98%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-0.64%

-6.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

0.75%

+1.59%

Volatility

NWHFX vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) at 0.88%. This indicates that NWHFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWHFXPYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

0.88%

+2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.40%

2.73%

+8.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

3.08%

+13.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.30%

3.96%

+16.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.77%

3.96%

+18.81%

NWHFX vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWHFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWHFX vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

NWHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.45%, more than PYLD's 6.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NWHFX
Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund
9.45%11.48%13.85%1.38%3.31%4.98%0.83%0.65%15.39%11.63%0.62%1.21%
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
6.44%6.21%6.40%2.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NWHFX and PYLD have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NWHFX has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to PYLD (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWHFX dropped -47.51% vs PYLD's -4.52%.

NWHFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWHFX and PYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer