PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSCVX vs. IWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WSCVX vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Walthausen Small Cap Value Fund (WSCVX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSCVX achieves a 25.53% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 19.72% return.


WSCVX

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.00%
6M
18.12%
YTD
25.53%
1Y
39.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IWM

1D
-0.85%
1M
0.42%
6M
12.70%
YTD
19.72%
1Y
33.75%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
10.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WSCVX vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WSCVX
Walthausen Small Cap Value Fund
25.53%13.80%29.11%7.98%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
19.72%12.66%11.38%10.04%

Correlation

The correlation between WSCVX and IWM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2023

0.92

The correlation between WSCVX and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSCVX vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSCVX
WSCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
WSCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
WSCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WSCVX vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Walthausen Small Cap Value Fund (WSCVX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WSCVXIWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

3.07

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.06

10.87

+3.19

WSCVX vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSCVX and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WSCVX vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSCVX drawdown since its inception was -22.34%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSCVX and IWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSCVXIWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.34%

-59.05%

+36.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-11.03%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-2.32%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-10.73%

+6.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

3.11%

-0.35%

Volatility

WSCVX vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

Walthausen Small Cap Value Fund (WSCVX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) have volatilities of 4.72% and 4.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSCVXIWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

4.81%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

14.19%

-2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.78%

19.54%

-1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.91%

22.56%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.91%

23.00%

-1.09%

WSCVX vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

WSCVX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

WSCVX vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

WSCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.54%, more than IWM's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.91%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%
WSCVX
Walthausen Small Cap Value Fund
10.54%13.23%28.71%9.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WSCVX and IWM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWM has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to WSCVX (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSCVX dropped -22.34% vs IWM's -59.05%.

WSCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSCVX and IWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer