PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWHFX vs. GMRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWHFX vs. GMRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) and Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund (GMRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NWHFX having a 16.75% return and GMRAX slightly higher at 16.80%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NWHFX having a 10.49% annualized return and GMRAX not far ahead at 10.52%.


NWHFX

1D
-1.45%
1M
0.06%
YTD
16.75%
6M
16.58%
1Y
36.20%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
10.49%

GMRAX

1D
-1.32%
1M
1.77%
YTD
16.80%
6M
14.71%
1Y
38.94%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
5.62%
10Y*
10.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWHFX vs. GMRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWHFX
Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund
16.75%9.95%10.23%15.78%-12.91%36.15%8.82%21.18%-16.17%4.04%
GMRAX
Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund
16.80%12.26%9.12%17.56%-20.82%14.27%19.59%24.87%-10.71%14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between NWHFX and GMRAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2013

0.94

The correlation between NWHFX and GMRAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWHFX vs. GMRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWHFX
NWHFX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NWHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
NWHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

GMRAX
GMRAX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GMRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GMRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWHFX vs. GMRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) and Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund (GMRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NWHFXGMRAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

3.50

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.58

12.40

+2.18

NWHFX vs. GMRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWHFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the GMRAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWHFX and GMRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NWHFXGMRAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.02

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.25

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.45

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.31

+0.13

Drawdowns

NWHFX vs. GMRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWHFX drawdown since its inception was -47.51%, smaller than the maximum GMRAX drawdown of -59.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHFX and GMRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWHFXGMRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.51%

-59.36%

+11.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-11.06%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.68%

-27.67%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.68%

-32.00%

+7.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.51%

-41.78%

-5.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-1.45%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-12.59%

+5.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

3.12%

-0.70%

Volatility

NWHFX vs. GMRAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) is 4.61%, while Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund (GMRAX) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that NWHFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWHFXGMRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

5.74%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

13.60%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.72%

19.20%

-2.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.57%

22.64%

-2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.79%

23.55%

-0.76%

NWHFX vs. GMRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWHFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GMRAX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWHFX vs. GMRAX - Dividend Comparison

NWHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.92%, more than GMRAX's 2.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMRAX
Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund
2.13%2.45%4.99%0.52%1.51%6.81%0.56%7.38%46.93%17.82%7.14%12.55%
NWHFX
Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund
9.92%11.48%13.85%1.38%3.31%4.98%0.83%0.65%15.39%11.63%0.62%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, NWHFX and GMRAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GMRAX has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to NWHFX (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWHFX dropped -47.51% vs GMRAX's -59.36%.

NWHFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWHFX and GMRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer