NVYY vs. PLTM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NVYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF) and PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - NVYY is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). NVYY is actively managed, while PLTM is passively managed. Over the past year, NVYY returned 31.22% vs 71.85% for PLTM. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PLTM.

Performance

NVYY vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVYY achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly higher than PLTM's -9.33% return.

NVYY

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 4.98%
• YTD: 4.60%
• 6M: 3.99%
• 1Y: 31.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTM

• 1D: -3.82%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: -9.33%
• 6M: 11.67%
• 1Y: 71.85%
• 3Y*: 22.22%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVYY vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF	4.60%	31.62%
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	-9.33%	105.95%

Correlation

The correlation between NVYY and PLTM is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025	0.14

Return for Risk

NVYY vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVYY

NVYY Risk / Return Rank: 35
NVYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
NVYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
NVYY Omega Ratio Rank: 36
NVYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
NVYY Martin Ratio Rank: 32

PLTM

PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 36
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 39
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVYY vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVYY	PLTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	1.41	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	1.80	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.26	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	2.09	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.82	4.43	+0.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVYY vs. PLTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVYY Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the PLTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVYY and PLTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVYY	PLTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	1.41	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.48	0.24	+1.24

Drawdowns

NVYY vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVYY drawdown since its inception was -14.90%, smaller than the maximum PLTM drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVYY and PLTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVYY	PLTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.90%	-42.32%	+27.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.90%	-34.52%	+19.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.86%	-33.02%	+28.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.00%	-18.55%	+13.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.50%	16.28%	-9.78%

Volatility

NVYY vs. PLTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) is 4.65%, while GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM) has a volatility of 10.88%. This indicates that NVYY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVYY	PLTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	10.88%	-6.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.78%	45.45%	-28.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.28%	51.40%	-27.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.10%	32.83%	-8.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.10%	30.98%	-6.88%

NVYY vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVYY vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison

NVYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 147.62%, while PLTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF	147.62%	75.30%
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVYY and PLTM in my portfolio?

NVYY and PLTM have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVYY or PLTM?

PLTM has higher volatility (10.88%) compared to NVYY (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVYY dropped -14.90% vs PLTM's -42.32%.

Which ETF is better, NVYY or PLTM?

On 1-year performance, PLTM leads with 71.85% vs 31.22% for NVYY. On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, NVYY has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVYY or PLTM?

Over the 1-year period, PLTM has performed better with a 71.85% return vs 31.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVYY or PLTM?

PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NVYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVYY or PLTM?

NVYY has the higher dividend yield at 147.62%, compared with 0.00% for PLTM.

What is the main difference between NVYY and PLTM?

NVYY is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PLTM is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for NVYY and 0.50% for PLTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.