NVYY vs. AAPW
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) and AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW).
NVYY and AAPW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NVYY is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on May 12, 2025. AAPW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025.
Performance
NVYY vs. AAPW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NVYY vs. AAPW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | -3.53% | 31.62% |
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF | -8.52% | 30.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVYY achieves a -3.53% return, which is significantly higher than AAPW's -8.52% return.
NVYY
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- -3.53%
- 6M
- -3.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPW
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- -8.52%
- 6M
- -2.72%
- 1Y
- 11.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NVYY vs. AAPW - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than AAPW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NVYY vs. AAPW — Risk / Return Rank
NVYY
AAPW
NVYY vs. AAPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) and AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVYY | AAPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | -0.02 | +1.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between NVYY and AAPW is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NVYY vs. AAPW - Dividend Comparison
NVYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 127.72%, more than AAPW's 37.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | 127.72% | 75.30% |
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF | 37.11% | 28.83% |
Drawdowns
NVYY vs. AAPW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVYY drawdown since its inception was -14.90%, smaller than the maximum AAPW drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVYY and AAPW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVYY | AAPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.90% | -36.28% | +21.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.26% | -13.79% | +1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.67% | -12.12% | +7.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.49% | — |
Volatility
NVYY vs. AAPW - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NVYY | AAPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.37% | 35.73% | -10.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.37% | 35.68% | -10.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.37% | 35.68% | -10.31% |