NVOH vs. RODM

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

NVOH (Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. NVOH is actively managed, while RODM is passively managed. Over the past year, NVOH returned -16.84% vs 24.91% for RODM. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVOH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.

Performance

NVOH vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVOH achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly lower than RODM's 12.92% return.

NVOH

• 1D: -1.96%
• 1M: 15.70%
• 6M: -15.26%
• YTD: 4.29%
• 1Y: -16.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RODM

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 1.59%
• 6M: 10.57%
• YTD: 12.92%
• 1Y: 24.91%
• 3Y*: 19.27%
• 5Y*: 10.27%
• 10Y*: 9.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVOH vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVOH Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF	4.29%	-43.79%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	12.92%	33.34%

Correlation

The correlation between NVOH and RODM is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2025	0.24

Return for Risk

NVOH vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVOH

NVOH Risk / Return Rank: 7
NVOH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
NVOH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
NVOH Omega Ratio Rank: 7
NVOH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
NVOH Martin Ratio Rank: 7

RODM

RODM Risk / Return Rank: 87
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVOH vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVOH	RODM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.34	2.31	-2.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.15	3.28	-3.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.42	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.37	3.52	-3.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.57	13.84	-14.41

NVOH vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVOH Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVOH and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVOH vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVOH drawdown since its inception was -61.60%, which is greater than RODM's maximum drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVOH and RODM.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVOH	RODM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.60%	-35.98%	-25.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.22%	-7.10%	-39.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.12%	-0.39%	-44.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.05%	-6.32%	-32.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.81%	1.80%	+28.01%

Volatility

NVOH vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) has a higher volatility of 9.21% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 2.73%. This indicates that NVOH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVOH	RODM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.21%	2.73%	+6.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.79%	8.91%	+26.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.29%	10.85%	+38.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.04%	13.45%	+34.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.04%	14.95%	+33.09%

NVOH vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVOH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVOH vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

NVOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%, more than RODM's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NVOH Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF	6.20%	2.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	2.82%	3.11%	4.09%	4.42%	3.81%	4.41%	2.82%	2.82%	2.03%	2.24%	3.19%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVOH and RODM in my portfolio?

NVOH and RODM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVOH or RODM?

NVOH has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to RODM (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVOH dropped -61.60% vs RODM's -35.98%.

Which ETF is better, NVOH or RODM?

On 1-year performance, RODM leads with 24.91% vs -16.84% for NVOH. On fees, NVOH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVOH or RODM?

Over the 1-year period, RODM has performed better with a 24.91% return vs -16.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVOH or RODM?

NVOH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RODM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVOH or RODM?

NVOH has the higher dividend yield at 6.20%, compared with 2.82% for RODM.

What is the main difference between NVOH and RODM?

They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NVOH and 0.29% for RODM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.