NVIT vs. CRSH
NVIT (YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF) and CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Their -0.47 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NVIT charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CRSH.
Performance
NVIT vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVIT achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly lower than CRSH's 26.66% return.
NVIT
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- YTD
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CRSH
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 17.65%
- 6M
- 21.15%
- YTD
- 26.66%
- 1Y
- -6.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $424.74K | $328.09K | $368.71K | |
| $409.18K | $321.88K | $299.20K |
NVIT vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVIT YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | 11.45% | 3.04% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 26.66% | -6.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVIT and CRSH is -0.47, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVIT vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank
NVIT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRSH
NVIT vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (NVIT) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVIT | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.01 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVIT vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVIT drawdown since its inception was -14.24%, smaller than the maximum CRSH drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVIT and CRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVIT | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.24% | -63.68% | +49.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -31.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.99% | -50.17% | +40.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -43.98% | +39.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.47% | — |
Volatility
NVIT vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVIT | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 26.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.42% | 36.89% | -7.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.42% | 47.50% | -18.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.42% | 47.50% | -18.08% |
NVIT vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVIT has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVIT vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison
NVIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.25%, less than CRSH's 75.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 75.02% | 138.78% | 94.25% |
NVIT YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | 17.25% | 2.37% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVIT and CRSH have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRSH is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRSH is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for NVIT.
CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 75.02%, compared with 17.25% for NVIT.
Their fees differ too: 1.08% for NVIT and 0.99% for CRSH.
Find the right allocation for NVIT and CRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer