PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVIT vs. COSW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVIT vs. COSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (NVIT) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVIT achieves a 9.26% return, which is significantly lower than COSW's 11.52% return.


NVIT

1D
-2.90%
1M
-5.21%
YTD
9.26%
6M
8.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COSW

1D
0.79%
1M
-8.50%
YTD
11.52%
6M
12.54%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVIT vs. COSW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NVIT and COSW is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

-0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVIT vs. COSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (NVIT) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NVIT vs. COSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVIT vs. COSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVIT drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, smaller than the maximum COSW drawdown of -16.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVIT and COSW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVITCOSWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-16.24%

+4.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.76%

-15.09%

+3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-4.88%

+1.45%

Volatility

NVIT vs. COSW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVITCOSWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.83%

25.53%

+4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.83%

25.53%

+4.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.83%

25.53%

+4.30%

NVIT vs. COSW - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVIT has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than COSW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVIT vs. COSW - Dividend Comparison

NVIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.77%, less than COSW's 19.66% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVIT and COSW have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COSW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COSW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for NVIT.

COSW has the higher dividend yield at 19.66%, compared with 14.77% for NVIT.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for NVIT and 0.99% for COSW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVIT and COSW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer