PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVIT vs. NVDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVIT vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (NVIT) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVIT achieves a 19.05% return, which is significantly higher than NVDY's 15.28% return.


NVIT

1D
2.46%
1M
10.59%
6M
24.72%
YTD
19.05%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

NVDY

1D
2.79%
1M
9.20%
6M
21.22%
YTD
15.28%
1Y
23.53%
3Y*
53.15%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
58.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$27.89M$27.94M$36.54M
$456.95K$363.78K$302.98K

NVIT vs. NVDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NVIT and NVDY is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.98

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVIT vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVIT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


NVDY
NVDY Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NVDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDY Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDY Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVIT vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (NVIT) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVITNVDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.50

NVIT vs. NVDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVIT vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVIT drawdown since its inception was -14.24%, smaller than the maximum NVDY drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVIT and NVDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVITNVDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.24%

-34.08%

+19.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.86%

-4.82%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-6.36%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.74%

Volatility

NVIT vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVITNVDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.50%

29.34%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.50%

37.94%

-8.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.50%

37.94%

-8.44%

NVIT vs. NVDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVIT has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVIT vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison

NVIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.68%, less than NVDY's 59.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
59.42%83.10%83.65%22.32%
NVIT
YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF
16.68%2.37%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, NVIT and NVDY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, NVDY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for NVIT.

NVDY has the higher dividend yield at 59.42%, compared with 16.68% for NVIT.

Their fees differ too: 1.08% for NVIT and 0.99% for NVDY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVIT and NVDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer