PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVIT vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVIT vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (NVIT) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVIT achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly higher than BUCK's 2.42% return.


NVIT

1D
2.26%
1M
4.18%
6M
9.05%
YTD
11.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

BUCK

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.17%
6M
1.84%
YTD
2.42%
1Y
5.36%
3Y*
5.15%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.71M$3.63M$3.94M
$409.18K$321.88K$299.20K

NVIT vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NVIT and BUCK is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVIT vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVIT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVIT vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (NVIT) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVITBUCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.83

NVIT vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVIT vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVIT drawdown since its inception was -14.24%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVIT and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVITBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.24%

-5.43%

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.99%

-0.11%

-9.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-0.47%

-4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

Volatility

NVIT vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVITBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.42%

2.59%

+26.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.42%

3.42%

+26.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.42%

3.42%

+26.00%

NVIT vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVIT has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVIT vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

NVIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.25%, more than BUCK's 7.20% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.20%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
NVIT
YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF
17.25%2.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVIT and BUCK have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for NVIT.

NVIT has the higher dividend yield at 17.25%, compared with 7.20% for BUCK.

NVIT is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for NVIT and 0.35% for BUCK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVIT and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer