PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVIT vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVIT vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (NVIT) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVIT achieves a 15.44% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 192.40% return.


NVIT

1D
-2.67%
1M
6.72%
YTD
15.44%
6M
19.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDW

1D
4.91%
1M
72.80%
YTD
192.40%
6M
186.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVIT vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NVIT and AMDW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVIT vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (NVIT) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NVIT vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVITAMDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

4.83

-3.46

Drawdowns

NVIT vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVIT drawdown since its inception was -11.11%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVIT and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVITAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.11%

-34.64%

+23.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.77%

0.00%

-6.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-14.66%

+11.80%

Volatility

NVIT vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVITAMDWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.08%

81.56%

-52.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.08%

81.56%

-52.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.08%

81.56%

-52.48%

NVIT vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVIT has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVIT vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

NVIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.36%, less than AMDW's 28.98% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVIT and AMDW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for NVIT.

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 28.98%, compared with 12.36% for NVIT.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for NVIT and 0.99% for AMDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVIT and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer