NVDQ vs. TSLZ

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds from T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDQ returned -50.45% vs -51.66% for TSLZ. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 1.05% expense ratio.

Performance

NVDQ vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDQ achieves a -39.70% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's 30.55% return.

NVDQ

• 1D: -5.06%
• 1M: -19.48%
• 6M: -42.67%
• YTD: -39.70%
• 1Y: -50.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -83.30%

TSLZ

• 1D: -3.37%
• 1M: 29.62%
• 6M: 18.97%
• YTD: 30.55%
• 1Y: -51.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -72.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	$24.84M	$29.28M	$55.12M
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF	$38.09M	$32.22M	$41.20M

NVDQ vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	-39.70%	-74.63%	-93.80%	-28.84%
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF	30.55%	-75.98%	-88.79%	-24.75%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDQ and TSLZ is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023	0.35

Return for Risk

NVDQ vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVDQ

NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 3
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1

TSLZ

TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 5
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVDQ vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDQ	TSLZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.70	-0.56	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.84	-0.48	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	0.95	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	-0.76	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.44	-0.93	-0.51

NVDQ vs. TSLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is comparable to the TSLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDQ and TSLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVDQ vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDQ drawdown since its inception was -99.45%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDQ and TSLZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDQ	TSLZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.45%	-99.11%	-0.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.17%	-68.61%	+7.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.39%	-98.63%	-0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.75%	-76.66%	-12.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	35.09%	55.35%	-20.26%

Volatility

NVDQ vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) is 24.71%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a volatility of 32.71%. This indicates that NVDQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDQ	TSLZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.71%	32.71%	-8.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.15%	67.42%	-10.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.63%	91.78%	-19.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	94.71%	117.59%	-22.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	94.71%	117.59%	-22.88%

NVDQ vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVDQ and TSLZ have an expense ratio of 1.05%.

Dividends

NVDQ vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison

NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than TSLZ's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	0.43%	0.26%	4.59%	11.60%
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF	0.53%	0.69%	2.08%	12.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDQ and TSLZ in my portfolio?

NVDQ and TSLZ have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDQ or TSLZ?

TSLZ has higher volatility (32.71%) compared to NVDQ (24.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDQ dropped -99.45% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.

Which ETF is better, NVDQ or TSLZ?

On 1-year performance, NVDQ leads with -50.45% vs -51.66% for TSLZ. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, NVDQ has been the lower-risk option at 24.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDQ or TSLZ?

Over the 1-year period, NVDQ has performed better with a -50.45% return vs -51.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDQ or TSLZ?

NVDQ and TSLZ have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDQ or TSLZ?

TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.43% for NVDQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.56 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.