NVDQ vs. TSLQ
NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) and TSLQ (AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDQ returned -69.65% vs -64.04% for TSLQ. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDQ charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for TSLQ.
Performance
NVDQ vs. TSLQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDQ achieves a -38.57% return, which is significantly lower than TSLQ's -1.38% return.
NVDQ
- 1D
- -3.82%
- 1M
- -23.21%
- YTD
- -38.57%
- 6M
- -41.67%
- 1Y
- -69.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLQ
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- -16.62%
- YTD
- -1.38%
- 6M
- -1.74%
- 1Y
- -64.04%
- 3Y*
- -67.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDQ vs. TSLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | -38.57% | -74.63% | -93.80% | -30.70% |
TSLQ AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF | -1.38% | -74.67% | -83.21% | -12.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDQ and TSLQ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDQ vs. TSLQ — Risk / Return Rank
NVDQ
TSLQ
NVDQ vs. TSLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDQ | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 0.90 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.85 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | -1.07 | -0.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDQ | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.03 | -0.69 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.89 | -0.64 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
NVDQ vs. TSLQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDQ drawdown since its inception was -99.45%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLQ drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDQ and TSLQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDQ | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.45% | -98.73% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.67% | -75.93% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -97.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.38% | -98.53% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.22% | -67.22% | -21.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.77% | 59.81% | -11.04% |
Volatility
NVDQ vs. TSLQ - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) has a higher volatility of 25.78% compared to AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) at 24.20%. This indicates that NVDQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDQ | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.78% | 24.20% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.89% | 54.90% | -3.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.77% | 92.72% | -24.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.47% | 94.07% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.47% | 94.07% | +1.40% |
NVDQ vs. TSLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDQ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLQ's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDQ vs. TSLQ - Dividend Comparison
NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than TSLQ's 10.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 0.42% | 0.26% | 4.59% | 11.60% | 0.00% |
TSLQ AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF | 10.71% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDQ and TSLQ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDQ has higher volatility (25.78%) compared to TSLQ (24.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDQ dropped -99.45% vs TSLQ's -98.73%.
On 1-year performance, TSLQ leads with -64.04% vs -69.65% for NVDQ. On fees, NVDQ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, TSLQ has been the lower-risk option at 24.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLQ has performed better with a -64.04% return vs -69.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDQ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSLQ.
TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.71%, compared with 0.42% for NVDQ.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and AXS. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDQ and 1.15% for TSLQ.
TSLQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.69 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDQ and TSLQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer