PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLQ vs. TSLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLQ vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLQ achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than TSLZ's -0.13% return.


TSLQ

1D
-2.22%
1M
6.08%
YTD
1.82%
6M
19.91%
1Y
-62.10%
3Y*
-65.39%
5Y*
10Y*

TSLZ

1D
-2.07%
1M
6.09%
YTD
-0.13%
6M
17.45%
1Y
-63.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLQ vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TSLQ
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF
1.82%-74.67%-83.21%-4.87%
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
-0.13%-75.98%-88.79%-24.75%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLQ and TSLZ is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023

0.99

The correlation between TSLQ and TSLZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLQ vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLQ
TSLQ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TSLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLZ
TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLQ vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLQTSLZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.89

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

-0.88

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.11

-1.12

+0.01

TSLQ vs. TSLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is comparable to the TSLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLQ and TSLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLQ vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLQ drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLQ and TSLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLQTSLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.73%

-99.11%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.21%

-72.88%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.48%

-98.95%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.58%

-75.67%

+8.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.11%

57.09%

-0.98%

Volatility

TSLQ vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) have volatilities of 25.56% and 25.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLQTSLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.56%

25.49%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.10%

56.21%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.72%

87.45%

+1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.17%

116.74%

-22.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

94.17%

116.74%

-22.57%

TSLQ vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLQ has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLQ vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison

TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.38%, more than TSLZ's 0.69% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
TSLQ
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF
10.38%10.56%4.95%13.35%2.56%
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
0.69%0.69%2.08%12.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, TSLQ and TSLZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSLQ has higher volatility (25.56%) compared to TSLZ (25.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLQ dropped -98.73% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.

On 1-year performance, TSLQ leads with -62.10% vs -63.91% for TSLZ. On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLQ has performed better with a -62.10% return vs -63.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for TSLQ.

TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.38%, compared with 0.69% for TSLZ.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for TSLQ and 1.05% for TSLZ.

TSLQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.70 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLQ and TSLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer