PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDQ vs. MSTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NVDQ vs. MSTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NVDQ vs. MSTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NVDQ
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
2.80%-74.63%-35.71%
MSTU
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF
-50.66%-89.07%197.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDQ achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly higher than MSTU's -50.66% return.


NVDQ

1D
-1.60%
1M
4.57%
YTD
2.80%
6M
-5.50%
1Y
-76.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTU

1D
-3.53%
1M
-25.05%
YTD
-50.66%
6M
-91.98%
1Y
-93.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NVDQ vs. MSTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVDQ and MSTU have an expense ratio of 1.05%.


Return for Risk

NVDQ vs. MSTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDQ
NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTU
MSTU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDQ vs. MSTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDQMSTUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.93

-0.64

-0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.68

-1.64

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

0.82

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

-0.96

+0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.03

-1.42

+0.39

NVDQ vs. MSTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the MSTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDQ and MSTU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDQMSTUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.93

-0.64

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.87

-0.41

-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between NVDQ and MSTU is -0.36. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

NVDQ vs. MSTU - Dividend Comparison

NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while MSTU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
NVDQ
T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
0.25%0.26%4.59%11.60%
MSTU
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NVDQ vs. MSTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDQ drawdown since its inception was -99.13%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTU drawdown of -98.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDQ and MSTU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDQMSTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.13%

-98.58%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.00%

-96.58%

+11.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.96%

-98.40%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.43%

-69.09%

-18.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

74.62%

65.01%

+9.61%

Volatility

NVDQ vs. MSTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) is 20.90%, while T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) has a volatility of 36.61%. This indicates that NVDQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NVDQMSTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.90%

36.61%

-15.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.76%

110.16%

-58.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.26%

145.85%

-63.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

96.76%

171.56%

-74.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.76%

171.56%

-74.80%