PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTU vs. MST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTU vs. MST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTU achieves a -65.58% return, which is significantly lower than MST's -59.06% return.


MSTU

1D
-7.44%
1M
-57.15%
YTD
-65.58%
6M
-71.11%
1Y
-96.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MST

1D
-7.02%
1M
-54.05%
YTD
-59.06%
6M
-64.02%
1Y
-94.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTU vs. MST - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSTU and MST is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025

0.99

The correlation between MSTU and MST has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

MSTU vs. MST - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSTU
MST

Technology

100.0%
-7.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

MSTU
100.0%
MST
-7.8%

Basic Materials

MSTU

-

MST

-

Communication Services

MSTU

-

MST

-

Consumer Cyclical

MSTU

-

MST

-

Consumer Defensive

MSTU

-

MST

-

Energy

MSTU

-

MST

-

Financial Services

MSTU

-

MST

-

Healthcare

MSTU

-

MST

-

Industrials

MSTU

-

MST

-

Real Estate

MSTU

-

MST

-

Utilities

MSTU

-

MST

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTU vs. MST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTU
MSTU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MSTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

MST
MST Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MST Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MST Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MST Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MST Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTU vs. MST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSTUMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

0.77

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

-0.98

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

-1.25

+0.02

MSTU vs. MST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is comparable to the MST Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTU and MST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSTU vs. MST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTU drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, roughly equal to the maximum MST drawdown of -95.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTU and MST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTUMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.89%

-95.63%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-97.32%

-95.63%

-1.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.89%

-95.63%

-3.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.45%

-63.27%

-9.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

77.82%

74.98%

+2.84%

Volatility

MSTU vs. MST - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) has a higher volatility of 44.20% compared to Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST) at 40.57%. This indicates that MSTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTUMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.20%

40.57%

+3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

113.76%

103.31%

+10.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

141.64%

129.40%

+12.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

168.68%

124.46%

+44.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

168.68%

124.46%

+44.22%

MSTU vs. MST - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MST's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTU vs. MST - Dividend Comparison

MSTU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 997.24%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, MSTU and MST move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MSTU has higher volatility (44.20%) compared to MST (40.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTU dropped -98.89% vs MST's -95.63%.

On 1-year performance, MST leads with -94.08% vs -96.10% for MSTU. On fees, MSTU is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, MST has been the lower-risk option at 40.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MST has performed better with a -94.08% return vs -96.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSTU is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for MST.

MST has the higher dividend yield at 997.24%, compared with 0.00% for MSTU.

MSTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MST is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTU and 1.31% for MST.

MSTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.68 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTU and MST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer