NVDQ vs. DZZ
NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) and DZZ (DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while DZZ is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%). NVDQ is actively managed, while DZZ is passively managed. Over the past year, NVDQ returned -69.65% vs 3.85% for DZZ. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDQ charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DZZ.
Performance
NVDQ vs. DZZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDQ achieves a -38.57% return, which is significantly higher than DZZ's -50.78% return.
NVDQ
- 1D
- -3.82%
- 1M
- -23.21%
- YTD
- -38.57%
- 6M
- -41.67%
- 1Y
- -69.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DZZ
- 1D
- -4.79%
- 1M
- -19.92%
- YTD
- -50.78%
- 6M
- -42.90%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- -8.41%
- 5Y*
- -5.74%
- 10Y*
- -10.94%
NVDQ vs. DZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | -38.57% | -74.63% | -93.80% | -30.70% |
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes | -50.78% | 132.78% | -35.06% | 2.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDQ and DZZ is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDQ vs. DZZ — Risk / Return Rank
NVDQ
DZZ
NVDQ vs. DZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDQ | DZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.21 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 0.05 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 0.07 | -1.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDQ | DZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.03 | 0.02 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.89 | -0.24 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
NVDQ vs. DZZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDQ drawdown since its inception was -99.45%, roughly equal to the maximum DZZ drawdown of -96.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDQ and DZZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDQ | DZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.45% | -96.64% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.67% | -80.84% | +7.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -80.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -80.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.38% | -95.40% | -3.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.22% | -82.30% | -5.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.77% | 53.43% | -4.66% |
Volatility
NVDQ vs. DZZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) is 25.78%, while DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) has a volatility of 30.48%. This indicates that NVDQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDQ | DZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.78% | 30.48% | -4.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.89% | 59.82% | -7.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.77% | 169.50% | -101.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.47% | 83.65% | +11.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.47% | 64.06% | +31.41% |
NVDQ vs. DZZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDQ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than DZZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDQ vs. DZZ - Dividend Comparison
NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while DZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 0.42% | 0.26% | 4.59% | 11.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDQ and DZZ have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DZZ has higher volatility (30.48%) compared to NVDQ (25.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDQ dropped -99.45% vs DZZ's -96.64%.
On 1-year performance, DZZ leads with 3.85% vs -69.65% for NVDQ. On fees, DZZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NVDQ has been the lower-risk option at 25.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DZZ has performed better with a 3.85% return vs -69.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DZZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NVDQ.
NVDQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for DZZ.
NVDQ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while DZZ is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDQ and 0.75% for DZZ.
DZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDQ and DZZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer