PortfoliosLab logo
DZZ vs. GLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DZZ and GLD is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: -0.0

Performance

DZZ vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-100.00%-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-92.03%
217.46%
DZZ
GLD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DZZ:

-0.17

GLD:

2.49

Sortino Ratio

DZZ:

0.13

GLD:

3.30

Omega Ratio

DZZ:

1.01

GLD:

1.43

Calmar Ratio

DZZ:

-0.10

GLD:

5.14

Martin Ratio

DZZ:

-0.49

GLD:

14.01

Ulcer Index

DZZ:

19.14%

GLD:

2.98%

Daily Std Dev

DZZ:

54.40%

GLD:

16.80%

Max Drawdown

DZZ:

-96.64%

GLD:

-45.56%

Current Drawdown

DZZ:

-95.27%

GLD:

-3.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DZZ achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 25.85% return. Over the past 10 years, DZZ has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of -12.52%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 10.42% annualized return.


DZZ

YTD

17.58%

1M

20.50%

6M

18.29%

1Y

-7.18%

5Y*

-12.58%

10Y*

-12.52%

GLD

YTD

25.85%

1M

7.28%

6M

20.29%

1Y

40.67%

5Y*

13.69%

10Y*

10.42%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DZZ vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for DZZ: current value is 0.75%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
DZZ: 0.75%
Expense ratio chart for GLD: current value is 0.40%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
GLD: 0.40%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DZZ vs. GLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DZZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DZZ is 1616
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DZZ is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DZZ is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DZZ is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DZZ is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DZZ is 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLD is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLD is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLD is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLD is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLD is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLD is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DZZ vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) and SPDR Gold Trust (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for DZZ, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
DZZ: -0.17
GLD: 2.49
The chart of Sortino ratio for DZZ, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
DZZ: 0.13
GLD: 3.30
The chart of Omega ratio for DZZ, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
DZZ: 1.01
GLD: 1.43
The chart of Calmar ratio for DZZ, currently valued at -0.10, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
DZZ: -0.10
GLD: 5.14
The chart of Martin ratio for DZZ, currently valued at -0.49, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
DZZ: -0.49
GLD: 14.01

The current DZZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DZZ and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.17
2.49
DZZ
GLD

Dividends

DZZ vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither DZZ nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DZZ vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DZZ drawdown since its inception was -96.64%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DZZ and GLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-95.27%
-3.44%
DZZ
GLD

Volatility

DZZ vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) has a higher volatility of 19.44% compared to SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) at 8.30%. This indicates that DZZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
19.44%
8.30%
DZZ
GLD