NVD vs. MSTZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ).

NVD and MSTZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NVD is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Aug 21, 2023. MSTZ is an actively managed fund by REX. It was launched on Sep 17, 2024.

Performance

NVD vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NVD vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	5.59%	-73.27%	-33.90%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-27.23%	-38.95%	-94.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVD achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -27.23% return.

NVD

• 1D: -11.38%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 5.59%
• 6M: -2.50%
• 1Y: -75.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: -5.53%
• 1M: -4.07%
• YTD: -27.23%
• 6M: 137.26%
• 1Y: -11.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVD vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

NVD

GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF

MSTZ

T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF

Return for Risk

NVD vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVD

NVD Risk / Return Rank: 1
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 4

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 20
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 35
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVD vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVD	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.92	-0.08	-0.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.62	1.02	-2.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.14	-0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	-0.12	-0.76
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.02	-0.17	-0.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVD vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVD Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVD and MSTZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVD	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.92	-0.08	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.85	-0.53	-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between NVD and MSTZ is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NVD vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.20%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	11.20%	11.83%	8.68%	15.78%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NVD vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVD drawdown since its inception was -98.85%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVD and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVD	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.85%	-99.36%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.54%	-83.20%	-1.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.58%	-97.45%	-1.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-80.48%	-93.91%	+13.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	73.89%	61.32%	+12.57%

Volatility

NVD vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) is 21.28%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 38.43%. This indicates that NVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVD	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.28%	38.43%	-17.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.32%	122.48%	-70.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	82.56%	147.15%	-64.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	93.63%	173.11%	-79.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	93.63%	173.11%	-79.48%