NVD vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVD returned -53.87% vs 279.21% for MSTZ. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVD charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

NVD vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVD achieves a -23.92% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's 1.05% return.

NVD

• 1D: 3.23%
• 1M: 15.01%
• YTD: -23.92%
• 6M: -22.14%
• 1Y: -53.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: 19.27%
• 1M: 186.45%
• YTD: 1.05%
• 6M: 9.89%
• 1Y: 279.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVD vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	-23.92%	-73.27%	-31.49%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	1.05%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between NVD and MSTZ is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	0.37

Return for Risk

NVD vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVD

NVD Risk / Return Rank: 3
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 3

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 62
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVD vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVD	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.76	1.93	-2.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.02	2.48	-3.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.32	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.81	3.31	-4.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.33	6.57	-7.91

NVD vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVD Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVD and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVD vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVD drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVD and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVD	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.26%	-99.38%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-66.81%	-84.89%	+18.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.98%	-96.56%	-2.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.90%	-94.46%	+12.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.42%	42.70%	-2.28%

Volatility

NVD vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) is 26.63%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 46.08%. This indicates that NVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVD	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.63%	46.08%	-19.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.05%	129.73%	-75.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.16%	145.84%	-74.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.48%	170.65%	-78.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.48%	170.65%	-78.17%

NVD vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVD vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.54%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	15.54%	11.83%	8.68%	15.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVD and MSTZ in my portfolio?

NVD and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVD or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (46.08%) compared to NVD (26.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVD dropped -99.26% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, NVD or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 279.21% vs -53.87% for NVD. On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, NVD has been the lower-risk option at 26.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVD or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 279.21% return vs -53.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVD or MSTZ?

MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVD or MSTZ?

NVD has the higher dividend yield at 15.54%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between NVD and MSTZ?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NVD and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.