NVD vs. AAPB
NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) and AAPB (GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while AAPB is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVD returned -68.07% vs 109.67% for AAPB. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. NVD charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for AAPB.
Performance
NVD vs. AAPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVD achieves a -37.20% return, which is significantly lower than AAPB's 24.78% return.
NVD
- 1D
- -3.65%
- 1M
- -22.72%
- YTD
- -37.20%
- 6M
- -40.09%
- 1Y
- -68.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPB
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 19.44%
- YTD
- 24.78%
- 6M
- 17.03%
- 1Y
- 109.67%
- 3Y*
- 24.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVD vs. AAPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | -37.20% | -73.27% | -93.09% | -15.28% |
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | 24.78% | -0.93% | 47.02% | 10.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVD and AAPB is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023 | -0.26 |
NVD vs. AAPB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NVD
AAPB
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
NVD
AAPB
Basic Materials
NVD
-
AAPB
-
Communication Services
NVD
-
AAPB
-
Consumer Cyclical
NVD
-
AAPB
-
Consumer Defensive
NVD
-
AAPB
-
Energy
NVD
-
AAPB
-
Financial Services
NVD
-
AAPB
-
Healthcare
NVD
-
AAPB
-
Industrials
NVD
-
AAPB
-
Real Estate
NVD
-
AAPB
-
Utilities
NVD
-
AAPB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVD vs. AAPB — Risk / Return Rank
NVD
AAPB
NVD vs. AAPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVD | AAPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.39 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 3.92 | -4.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | 9.45 | -10.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVD | AAPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 | 2.46 | -3.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.88 | 0.38 | -1.26 |
Drawdowns
NVD vs. AAPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVD drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, which is greater than AAPB's maximum drawdown of -58.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVD and AAPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVD | AAPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.26% | -58.13% | -41.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.64% | -28.11% | -44.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -58.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.15% | -2.46% | -96.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.68% | -19.34% | -62.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.83% | 11.65% | +36.18% |
Volatility
NVD vs. AAPB - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) has a higher volatility of 25.96% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) at 10.29%. This indicates that NVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVD | AAPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.96% | 10.29% | +15.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.11% | 31.90% | +20.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.48% | 44.81% | +23.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.55% | 51.30% | +41.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.55% | 51.30% | +41.25% |
NVD vs. AAPB - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AAPB's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVD vs. AAPB - Dividend Comparison
NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.83%, more than AAPB's 3.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | 3.52% | 4.39% | 0.00% | 18.75% |
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | 18.83% | 11.83% | 8.68% | 15.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVD and AAPB have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVD has higher volatility (25.96%) compared to AAPB (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVD dropped -99.26% vs AAPB's -58.13%.
On 1-year performance, AAPB leads with 109.67% vs -68.07% for NVD. On fees, AAPB is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, AAPB has been the lower-risk option at 10.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAPB has performed better with a 109.67% return vs -68.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAPB is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.
NVD has the higher dividend yield at 18.83%, compared with 3.52% for AAPB.
NVD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AAPB is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NVD and 1.15% for AAPB.
AAPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVD and AAPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer