PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVD vs. AAPB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVD vs. AAPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVD achieves a -37.20% return, which is significantly lower than AAPB's 24.78% return.


NVD

1D
-3.65%
1M
-22.72%
YTD
-37.20%
6M
-40.09%
1Y
-68.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AAPB

1D
0.87%
1M
19.44%
YTD
24.78%
6M
17.03%
1Y
109.67%
3Y*
24.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVD vs. AAPB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
-37.20%-73.27%-93.09%-15.28%
AAPB
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF
24.78%-0.93%47.02%10.39%

Correlation

The correlation between NVD and AAPB is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023

-0.26

NVD vs. AAPB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NVD
AAPB

Technology

199.7%
66.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

NVD
199.7%
AAPB
66.7%

Basic Materials

NVD

-

AAPB

-

Communication Services

NVD

-

AAPB

-

Consumer Cyclical

NVD

-

AAPB

-

Consumer Defensive

NVD

-

AAPB

-

Energy

NVD

-

AAPB

-

Financial Services

NVD

-

AAPB

-

Healthcare

NVD

-

AAPB

-

Industrials

NVD

-

AAPB

-

Real Estate

NVD

-

AAPB

-

Utilities

NVD

-

AAPB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVD vs. AAPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVD
NVD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPB
AAPB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AAPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPB Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPB Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVD vs. AAPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDAAPBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.39

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

3.92

-4.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

9.45

-10.88

NVD vs. AAPB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVD Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the AAPB Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVD and AAPB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDAAPBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.00

2.46

-3.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.88

0.38

-1.26

Drawdowns

NVD vs. AAPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVD drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, which is greater than AAPB's maximum drawdown of -58.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVD and AAPB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDAAPBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.26%

-58.13%

-41.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.64%

-28.11%

-44.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.15%

-2.46%

-96.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.68%

-19.34%

-62.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.83%

11.65%

+36.18%

Volatility

NVD vs. AAPB - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) has a higher volatility of 25.96% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) at 10.29%. This indicates that NVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDAAPBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.96%

10.29%

+15.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.11%

31.90%

+20.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.48%

44.81%

+23.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

92.55%

51.30%

+41.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

92.55%

51.30%

+41.25%

NVD vs. AAPB - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AAPB's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVD vs. AAPB - Dividend Comparison

NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.83%, more than AAPB's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AAPB
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF
3.52%4.39%0.00%18.75%
NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
18.83%11.83%8.68%15.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVD and AAPB have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVD has higher volatility (25.96%) compared to AAPB (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVD dropped -99.26% vs AAPB's -58.13%.

On 1-year performance, AAPB leads with 109.67% vs -68.07% for NVD. On fees, AAPB is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, AAPB has been the lower-risk option at 10.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAPB has performed better with a 109.67% return vs -68.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AAPB is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.

NVD has the higher dividend yield at 18.83%, compared with 3.52% for AAPB.

NVD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AAPB is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NVD and 1.15% for AAPB.

AAPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVD and AAPB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer