NUS vs. WWW
NUS (Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.) and WWW (Wolverine World Wide, Inc.) are both stocks. NUS operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while WWW operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, NUS returned -18.08%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for WWW. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NUS vs. WWW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUS achieves a -45.12% return, which is significantly lower than WWW's 10.37% return. Over the past 10 years, NUS has underperformed WWW with an annualized return of -18.08%, while WWW has yielded a comparatively higher 0.07% annualized return.
NUS
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- 6M
- -50.24%
- YTD
- -45.12%
- 1Y
- -34.92%
- 3Y*
- -42.10%
- 5Y*
- -35.06%
- 10Y*
- -18.08%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.55%
WWW
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 19.06%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- YTD
- 10.37%
- 1Y
- -9.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- -7.75%
- 10Y*
- 0.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.37M | $2.89M | $3.95M | |
| $15.55M | $14.21M | $18.00M |
NUS vs. WWW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUS Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. | -45.12% | 43.29% | -63.67% | -51.07% | -13.92% | -4.32% | 38.67% | -30.98% | -8.32% | 46.55% |
WWW Wolverine World Wide, Inc. | 10.37% | -16.51% | 155.30% | -15.58% | -61.09% | -6.69% | -5.72% | 7.18% | 0.99% | 46.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUS and WWW is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 1996 | 0.31 |
Fundamentals
NUS:
$251.98M
WWW:
$1.61B
NUS:
$1.09
WWW:
$1.27
NUS:
4.75
WWW:
15.48
NUS:
0.18
WWW:
0.84
NUS:
0.32
WWW:
2.96
NUS:
$1.44B
WWW:
$1.92B
NUS:
$998.90M
WWW:
$904.90M
NUS:
$115.40M
WWW:
$186.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUS vs. WWW — Risk / Return Rank
NUS
WWW
NUS vs. WWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. (NUS) and Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUS | WWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.01 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | -0.20 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | -0.27 | -0.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUS vs. WWW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUS drawdown since its inception was -94.67%, which is greater than WWW's maximum drawdown of -82.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUS and WWW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUS | WWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.67% | -82.56% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.64% | -54.62% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.37% | -57.98% | -21.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.58% | -79.74% | -9.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.43% | -82.56% | -9.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.40% | -49.06% | -45.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.31% | -25.43% | -22.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.40% | 40.04% | -4.64% |
Volatility
NUS vs. WWW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. (NUS) is 11.80%, while Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW) has a volatility of 14.96%. This indicates that NUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUS | WWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.80% | 14.96% | -3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.91% | 35.58% | -1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.70% | 54.23% | -3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.34% | 58.46% | -11.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.11% | 50.69% | -1.58% |
Dividends
NUS vs. WWW - Dividend Comparison
NUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than WWW's 2.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUS Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. | 4.62% | 2.49% | 3.48% | 8.03% | 3.65% | 3.00% | 2.75% | 3.61% | 2.38% | 2.11% | 2.97% | 3.69% |
WWW Wolverine World Wide, Inc. | 2.03% | 2.20% | 1.35% | 4.50% | 3.66% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.19% | 1.00% | 0.75% | 1.09% | 2.81% |
Financials
NUS vs. WWW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. and Wolverine World Wide, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NUS vs. WWW - Profitability Comparison
NUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 214.46M and revenue of 320.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.9%.
WWW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Wolverine World Wide, Inc. reported a gross profit of 217.80M and revenue of 457.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.6%.
NUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.03M and revenue of 320.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
WWW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Wolverine World Wide, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.90M and revenue of 457.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.
NUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of 1.84M and revenue of 320.61M, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
WWW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Wolverine World Wide, Inc. reported a net income of 20.20M and revenue of 457.60M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NUS and WWW have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WWW has higher volatility (14.96%) compared to NUS (11.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUS dropped -94.67% vs WWW's -82.56%.
WWW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUS and WWW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer