WWW vs. FRD
WWW (Wolverine World Wide, Inc.) and FRD (Friedman Industries, Incorporated) are both stocks. WWW operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical), while FRD operates in Steel (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, WWW returned 0.35%/yr vs 21.55%/yr for FRD. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WWW vs. FRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WWW achieves a -3.45% return, which is significantly lower than FRD's 82.03% return. Over the past 10 years, WWW has underperformed FRD with an annualized return of 0.35%, while FRD has yielded a comparatively higher 21.55% annualized return.
WWW
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- -3.45%
- 6M
- -3.03%
- 1Y
- 2.46%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- -10.39%
- 10Y*
- 0.35%
FRD
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 79.64%
- YTD
- 82.03%
- 6M
- 81.77%
- 1Y
- 124.24%
- 3Y*
- 57.99%
- 5Y*
- 22.18%
- 10Y*
- 21.55%
WWW vs. FRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WWW Wolverine World Wide, Inc. | -3.45% | -16.51% | 155.30% | -15.58% | -61.09% | -6.69% | -5.72% | 7.18% | 0.99% | 46.48% |
FRD Friedman Industries, Incorporated | 82.03% | 35.33% | -0.26% | 58.98% | 5.34% | 37.91% | 15.73% | -12.71% | 26.02% | -14.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between WWW and FRD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992 | 0.11 |
The correlation between WWW and FRD shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WWW:
$1.27
FRD:
$3.73
WWW:
13.59
FRD:
9.97
WWW:
0.74
FRD:
0.30
WWW:
$1.92B
FRD:
$646.91M
WWW:
$904.90M
FRD:
$32.71M
WWW:
$186.40M
FRD:
$26.09M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WWW vs. FRD — Risk / Return Rank
WWW
FRD
WWW vs. FRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW) and Friedman Industries, Incorporated (FRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WWW | FRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.42 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | 5.05 | -5.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.07 | 10.86 | -10.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WWW vs. FRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WWW drawdown since its inception was -82.56%, which is greater than FRD's maximum drawdown of -71.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWW and FRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WWW | FRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.56% | -71.00% | -11.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.62% | -24.77% | -29.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.98% | -46.49% | -11.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.74% | -53.55% | -26.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.56% | -65.09% | -17.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.44% | -0.72% | -54.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.35% | -34.68% | +9.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.35% | 11.49% | +25.86% |
Volatility
WWW vs. FRD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW) is 16.13%, while Friedman Industries, Incorporated (FRD) has a volatility of 28.55%. This indicates that WWW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WWW | FRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.13% | 28.55% | -12.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.83% | 38.23% | -4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.45% | 54.72% | -1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.11% | 54.19% | +3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.64% | 49.65% | +0.99% |
Dividends
WWW vs. FRD - Dividend Comparison
WWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than FRD's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRD Friedman Industries, Incorporated | 0.43% | 0.78% | 0.92% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.85% | 1.17% | 2.66% | 1.70% | 0.70% | 0.60% | 0.90% |
WWW Wolverine World Wide, Inc. | 2.31% | 2.20% | 1.35% | 4.50% | 3.66% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.19% | 1.00% | 0.75% | 1.09% | 2.81% |
Financials
WWW vs. FRD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wolverine World Wide, Inc. and Friedman Industries, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WWW vs. FRD - Profitability Comparison
WWW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wolverine World Wide, Inc. reported a gross profit of 217.80M and revenue of 457.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.6%.
FRD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Friedman Industries, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 191.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WWW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wolverine World Wide, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.90M and revenue of 457.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.
FRD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Friedman Industries, Incorporated reported an operating income of 11.83M and revenue of 191.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.
WWW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wolverine World Wide, Inc. reported a net income of 20.20M and revenue of 457.60M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
FRD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Friedman Industries, Incorporated reported a net income of 9.19M and revenue of 191.78M, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WWW and FRD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRD has higher volatility (28.55%) compared to WWW (16.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWW dropped -82.56% vs FRD's -71.00%.
FRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WWW and FRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer