NUS vs. BLBD
NUS (Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.) and BLBD (Blue Bird Corporation) are both stocks. NUS operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while BLBD operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, NUS returned -18.08%/yr vs 17.69%/yr for BLBD. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NUS vs. BLBD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUS achieves a -45.12% return, which is significantly lower than BLBD's 58.28% return. Over the past 10 years, NUS has underperformed BLBD with an annualized return of -18.08%, while BLBD has yielded a comparatively higher 17.69% annualized return.
NUS
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- 6M
- -50.24%
- YTD
- -45.12%
- 1Y
- -34.92%
- 3Y*
- -42.10%
- 5Y*
- -35.06%
- 10Y*
- -18.08%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.55%
BLBD
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- 6M
- 47.86%
- YTD
- 58.28%
- 1Y
- 71.68%
- 3Y*
- 52.13%
- 5Y*
- 24.37%
- 10Y*
- 17.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $39.21M | $34.12M | $35.39M | |
| $2.37M | $2.89M | $3.95M |
NUS vs. BLBD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUS Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. | -45.12% | 43.29% | -63.67% | -51.07% | -13.92% | -4.32% | 38.67% | -30.98% | -8.32% | 46.55% |
BLBD Blue Bird Corporation | 58.28% | 21.67% | 43.29% | 151.73% | -31.52% | -14.35% | -20.33% | 26.00% | -8.59% | 28.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUS and BLBD is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2014 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
NUS:
$251.98M
BLBD:
$2.35B
NUS:
$1.09
BLBD:
$4.07
NUS:
4.75
BLBD:
18.27
NUS:
0.01
BLBD:
0.17
NUS:
0.18
BLBD:
1.63
NUS:
0.32
BLBD:
8.13
NUS:
$1.44B
BLBD:
$1.49B
NUS:
$998.90M
BLBD:
$314.22M
NUS:
$115.40M
BLBD:
$181.06M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUS vs. BLBD — Risk / Return Rank
NUS
BLBD
NUS vs. BLBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. (NUS) and Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUS | BLBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.28 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 2.83 | -3.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 6.36 | -7.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUS vs. BLBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUS drawdown since its inception was -94.67%, which is greater than BLBD's maximum drawdown of -74.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUS and BLBD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUS | BLBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.67% | -74.16% | -20.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.64% | -23.45% | -37.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.54% | -45.95% | -33.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.58% | -71.03% | -18.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.43% | -74.16% | -18.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.40% | -8.72% | -85.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.31% | -20.39% | -27.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.40% | 10.43% | +24.97% |
Volatility
NUS vs. BLBD - Volatility Comparison
Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. (NUS) has a higher volatility of 11.80% compared to Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) at 9.08%. This indicates that NUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUS | BLBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.80% | 9.08% | +2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.91% | 32.22% | +1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.70% | 43.63% | +7.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.34% | 56.47% | -9.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.11% | 51.34% | -2.23% |
Dividends
NUS vs. BLBD - Dividend Comparison
NUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, while BLBD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLBD Blue Bird Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUS Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. | 4.62% | 2.49% | 3.48% | 8.03% | 3.65% | 3.00% | 2.75% | 3.61% | 2.38% | 2.11% | 2.97% | 3.69% |
Financials
NUS vs. BLBD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. and Blue Bird Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NUS vs. BLBD - Profitability Comparison
NUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 214.46M and revenue of 320.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.9%.
BLBD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Blue Bird Corporation reported a gross profit of 70.65M and revenue of 352.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.
NUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.03M and revenue of 320.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
BLBD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Blue Bird Corporation reported an operating income of 39.12M and revenue of 352.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
NUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of 1.84M and revenue of 320.61M, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
BLBD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Blue Bird Corporation reported a net income of 29.30M and revenue of 352.64M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NUS and BLBD have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUS has higher volatility (11.80%) compared to BLBD (9.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUS dropped -94.67% vs BLBD's -74.16%.
BLBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUS and BLBD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer