NUS vs. FRD
NUS (Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.) and FRD (Friedman Industries, Incorporated) are both stocks. NUS operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while FRD operates in Steel (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, NUS returned -15.93%/yr vs 16.43%/yr for FRD. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NUS vs. FRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUS achieves a -43.75% return, which is significantly lower than FRD's 19.41% return. Over the past 10 years, NUS has underperformed FRD with an annualized return of -15.93%, while FRD has yielded a comparatively higher 16.43% annualized return.
NUS
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -26.69%
- YTD
- -43.75%
- 6M
- -44.84%
- 1Y
- -30.58%
- 3Y*
- -44.03%
- 5Y*
- -36.38%
- 10Y*
- -15.93%
FRD
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- 16.66%
- YTD
- 19.41%
- 6M
- 24.71%
- 1Y
- 46.14%
- 3Y*
- 37.81%
- 5Y*
- 12.57%
- 10Y*
- 16.43%
NUS vs. FRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUS Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. | -43.75% | 43.29% | -63.67% | -51.07% | -13.92% | -4.32% | 38.67% | -30.98% | -8.32% | 46.55% |
FRD Friedman Industries, Incorporated | 19.41% | 35.33% | -0.26% | 58.98% | 5.34% | 37.91% | 15.73% | -12.71% | 26.02% | -14.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUS and FRD is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 1996 | 0.10 |
The correlation between NUS and FRD shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NUS:
$1.10
FRD:
$3.57
NUS:
4.86
FRD:
6.82
NUS:
0.18
FRD:
0.19
NUS:
$1.44B
FRD:
$584.35M
NUS:
$998.90M
FRD:
$38.95M
NUS:
$115.40M
FRD:
$26.21M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUS vs. FRD — Risk / Return Rank
NUS
FRD
NUS vs. FRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. (NUS) and Friedman Industries, Incorporated (FRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUS | FRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.21 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 1.87 | -2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 4.01 | -5.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUS | FRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 | 1.04 | -1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.78 | 0.24 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.33 | 0.34 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.23 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
NUS vs. FRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUS drawdown since its inception was -94.30%, which is greater than FRD's maximum drawdown of -71.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUS and FRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUS | FRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.30% | -71.00% | -23.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.93% | -24.77% | -33.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.43% | -46.49% | -36.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.89% | -53.55% | -36.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.91% | -65.09% | -26.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.26% | -0.04% | -94.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.07% | -34.73% | -13.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.10% | 11.53% | +15.57% |
Volatility
NUS vs. FRD - Volatility Comparison
Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. (NUS) and Friedman Industries, Incorporated (FRD) have volatilities of 12.63% and 12.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUS | FRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.63% | 12.99% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.53% | 28.16% | +5.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.23% | 44.57% | +8.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.01% | 52.31% | -5.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.14% | 48.58% | +0.56% |
Dividends
NUS vs. FRD - Dividend Comparison
NUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than FRD's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRD Friedman Industries, Incorporated | 0.66% | 0.78% | 0.92% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.85% | 1.17% | 2.66% | 1.70% | 0.70% | 0.60% | 0.90% |
NUS Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. | 4.51% | 2.49% | 3.48% | 8.03% | 3.65% | 3.00% | 2.75% | 3.61% | 2.38% | 2.11% | 2.97% | 3.69% |
Financials
NUS vs. FRD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. and Friedman Industries, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NUS vs. FRD - Profitability Comparison
NUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 214.46M and revenue of 320.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.9%.
FRD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Friedman Industries, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 167.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.03M and revenue of 320.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
FRD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Friedman Industries, Incorporated reported an operating income of 3.90M and revenue of 167.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.
NUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of 1.84M and revenue of 320.61M, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
FRD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Friedman Industries, Incorporated reported a net income of 4.00M and revenue of 167.97M, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NUS and FRD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRD has higher volatility (12.99%) compared to NUS (12.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUS dropped -94.30% vs FRD's -71.00%.
FRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUS and FRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer