PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRD vs. AEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FRD vs. AEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Friedman Industries, Incorporated (FRD) and American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRD achieves a 65.32% return, which is significantly higher than AEP's 18.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FRD has outperformed AEP with an annualized return of 20.38%, while AEP has yielded a comparatively lower 11.04% annualized return.


FRD

1D
-4.37%
1M
63.15%
YTD
65.32%
6M
62.94%
1Y
106.75%
3Y*
53.00%
5Y*
19.95%
10Y*
20.38%

AEP

1D
0.91%
1M
2.56%
YTD
18.82%
6M
18.82%
1Y
34.81%
3Y*
21.78%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*
11.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRD vs. AEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRD
Friedman Industries, Incorporated
65.32%35.33%-0.26%58.98%5.34%37.91%15.73%-12.71%26.02%-14.17%
AEP
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
18.82%29.38%18.18%-10.98%10.38%10.68%-9.01%30.52%5.38%20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FRD and AEP is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992

0.04

Fundamentals

EPS

FRD:

$3.73

AEP:

$6.82

PE Ratio

FRD:

9.05

AEP:

19.78

PEG Ratio

FRD:

0.20

AEP:

2.22

PS Ratio

FRD:

0.27

AEP:

3.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

FRD:

$646.91M

AEP:

$22.16B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FRD:

$32.71M

AEP:

$8.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

FRD:

$26.09M

AEP:

$8.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRD vs. AEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRD
FRD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRD Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

AEP
AEP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRD vs. AEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Friedman Industries, Incorporated (FRD) and American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRDAEPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.34

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

3.85

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.32

9.42

-0.11

FRD vs. AEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRD Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the AEP Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRD and AEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRD vs. AEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRD drawdown since its inception was -71.00%, which is greater than AEP's maximum drawdown of -62.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRD and AEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRDAEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.00%

-62.75%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.77%

-9.09%

-15.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.49%

-18.04%

-28.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.01%

-29.56%

-20.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.09%

-32.91%

-32.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.83%

-0.88%

-8.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.67%

-17.54%

-17.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.50%

3.71%

+7.79%

Volatility

FRD vs. AEP - Volatility Comparison

Friedman Industries, Incorporated (FRD) has a higher volatility of 30.17% compared to American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP) at 6.23%. This indicates that FRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRDAEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.17%

6.23%

+23.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.94%

13.60%

+25.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.98%

18.53%

+36.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.17%

20.03%

+34.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.69%

21.00%

+28.69%

Dividends

FRD vs. AEP - Dividend Comparison

FRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than AEP's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEP
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
2.80%3.24%3.87%4.15%3.34%3.37%3.41%2.87%3.39%3.25%3.61%3.69%
FRD
Friedman Industries, Incorporated
0.47%0.78%0.92%0.52%0.82%0.85%1.17%2.66%1.70%0.70%0.60%0.90%

Financials

FRD vs. AEP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Friedman Industries, Incorporated and American Electric Power Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
191.78M
6.02B
(FRD) Total Revenue
(AEP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FRD vs. AEP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Friedman Industries, Incorporated and American Electric Power Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
64.8%
Portfolio components
FRD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Friedman Industries, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 191.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Electric Power Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.90B and revenue of 6.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.8%.

FRD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Friedman Industries, Incorporated reported an operating income of 11.83M and revenue of 191.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

AEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Electric Power Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.36B and revenue of 6.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.6%.

FRD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Friedman Industries, Incorporated reported a net income of 9.19M and revenue of 191.78M, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.

AEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Electric Power Company, Inc. reported a net income of 874.00M and revenue of 6.02B, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FRD and AEP have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRD has higher volatility (30.17%) compared to AEP (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRD dropped -71.00% vs AEP's -62.75%.

FRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRD and AEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer