PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NULG vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NULG vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULG achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 9.37% return.


NULG

1D
-3.99%
1M
1.77%
YTD
12.10%
6M
10.55%
1Y
21.50%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
13.73%
10Y*

SPYG

1D
-3.83%
1M
0.23%
YTD
9.37%
6M
8.40%
1Y
29.53%
3Y*
26.56%
5Y*
15.17%
10Y*
17.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NULG vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
12.10%14.07%23.75%42.71%-28.43%28.06%39.58%39.23%0.31%24.57%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.37%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NULG and SPYG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016

0.91

The correlation between NULG and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

NULG vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NULG
SPYG

Technology

56.5%
51.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
8.9%

Industrials

9.4%
5.0%

Financial Services

7.1%
8.5%

Communication Services

6.5%
16.8%

Healthcare

5.5%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
1.0%

Basic Materials

1.9%
0.3%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.6%

Energy

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Technology

NULG
56.5%
SPYG
51.9%

Consumer Cyclical

NULG
9.8%
SPYG
8.9%

Industrials

NULG
9.4%
SPYG
5.0%

Financial Services

NULG
7.1%
SPYG
8.5%

Communication Services

NULG
6.5%
SPYG
16.8%

Healthcare

NULG
5.5%
SPYG
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

NULG
2.1%
SPYG
1.0%

Basic Materials

NULG
1.9%
SPYG
0.3%

Real Estate

NULG
1.2%
SPYG
0.6%

Energy

NULG

-

SPYG
0.1%

Utilities

NULG

-

SPYG
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NULG vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULG
NULG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NULG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
NULG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULG vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NULGSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.32

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

2.16

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.04

8.88

-3.83

NULG vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULG Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULG and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NULGSPYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.80

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.72

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.35

+0.52

Drawdowns

NULG vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULG drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULG and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NULGSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

-67.63%

+31.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.50%

-13.76%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

-22.14%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.17%

-32.67%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.94%

-4.93%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-24.32%

+17.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

3.33%

+0.94%

Volatility

NULG vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 5.63%. This indicates that NULG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NULGSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

5.63%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

13.09%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.49%

16.53%

+0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.58%

21.23%

+0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.43%

20.68%

+0.75%

NULG vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NULG vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

NULG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than SPYG's 0.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.10%0.11%0.16%0.43%0.40%5.08%2.68%1.10%3.73%0.61%0.00%0.00%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.48%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, NULG and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NULG has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to SPYG (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NULG dropped -36.17% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 15.17% vs 13.73% for NULG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 15.17% return vs 13.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for NULG.

SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.10% for NULG.

NULG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. NULG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Growth, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NULG and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NULG and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer