PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NULG vs. CCOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NULG vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NULG vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
-7.01%14.07%23.75%42.71%-28.43%28.06%39.58%39.23%0.31%10.93%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
-0.34%3.52%-5.70%-11.92%2.51%9.90%4.07%6.03%4.64%3.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULG achieves a -7.01% return, which is significantly lower than CCOR's -0.34% return.


NULG

1D
3.87%
1M
-4.51%
YTD
-7.01%
6M
-8.45%
1Y
16.31%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
10.39%
10Y*

CCOR

1D
0.65%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
0.35%
1Y
-1.48%
3Y*
-3.32%
5Y*
-0.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NULG vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NULG vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULG
NULG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
NULG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
NULG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULG Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

CCOR
CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULG vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NULGCCORDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.74

-0.14

+0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

-0.14

+1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.98

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

-0.19

+1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.82

-0.35

+4.17

NULG vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULG Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULG and CCOR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NULGCCORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

-0.14

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

-0.08

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.15

+0.62

Correlation

The correlation between NULG and CCOR is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NULG vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

NULG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than CCOR's 1.07% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.12%0.11%0.16%0.43%0.40%5.08%2.68%1.10%3.73%0.61%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
1.07%1.07%1.18%1.21%1.11%1.02%1.50%0.73%1.53%0.89%

Drawdowns

NULG vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULG drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULG and CCOR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NULGCCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

-22.99%

-13.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.50%

-9.17%

-5.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.17%

-22.99%

-13.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.19%

-17.23%

+6.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.93%

-7.07%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

4.95%

-0.67%

Volatility

NULG vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 2.17%. This indicates that NULG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NULGCCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.12%

2.17%

+4.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

5.44%

+8.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.23%

10.74%

+11.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.47%

11.13%

+10.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.46%

10.81%

+10.65%