PortfoliosLab logo
NULC vs. DMXF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NULC and DMXF is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

NULC vs. DMXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NULC:

0.72

DMXF:

0.54

Sortino Ratio

NULC:

1.02

DMXF:

0.82

Omega Ratio

NULC:

1.14

DMXF:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

NULC:

0.68

DMXF:

0.54

Martin Ratio

NULC:

2.55

DMXF:

1.64

Ulcer Index

NULC:

4.75%

DMXF:

5.47%

Daily Std Dev

NULC:

19.04%

DMXF:

18.71%

Max Drawdown

NULC:

-34.86%

DMXF:

-34.52%

Current Drawdown

NULC:

-1.80%

DMXF:

-0.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULC achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly lower than DMXF's 13.37% return.


NULC

YTD

3.35%

1M

6.17%

6M

-1.24%

1Y

12.82%

3Y*

12.80%

5Y*

14.03%

10Y*

N/A

DMXF

YTD

13.37%

1M

5.08%

6M

9.48%

1Y

9.35%

3Y*

10.91%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF

NULC vs. DMXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DMXF's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NULC vs. DMXF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NULC is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NULC is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NULC is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NULC is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NULC is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NULC is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

DMXF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DMXF is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DMXF is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DMXF is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DMXF is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DMXF is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DMXF is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NULC vs. DMXF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NULC Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the DMXF Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULC and DMXF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NULC vs. DMXF - Dividend Comparison

NULC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than DMXF's 2.57% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
NULC
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
2.60%2.69%1.32%2.37%6.14%4.07%0.78%
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
2.57%2.92%2.29%2.37%1.91%0.31%0.00%

Drawdowns

NULC vs. DMXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULC drawdown since its inception was -34.86%, roughly equal to the maximum DMXF drawdown of -34.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULC and DMXF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NULC vs. DMXF - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) at 3.33%. This indicates that NULC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...