NUKZ vs. VITL
NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index, while VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, NUKZ returned 5.48% vs -63.21% for VITL. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NUKZ vs. VITL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly higher than VITL's -56.92% return.
NUKZ
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -12.76%
- 6M
- -11.94%
- YTD
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 5.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 43.65%
VITL
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 32.18%
- 6M
- -52.96%
- YTD
- -56.92%
- 1Y
- -63.21%
- 3Y*
- 8.81%
- 5Y*
- -6.89%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -14.48%
NUKZ vs. VITL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | -1.84% | 56.57% | 60.11% |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | -56.92% | -15.26% | 158.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUKZ and VITL is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024 | 0.12 |
The correlation between NUKZ and VITL shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUKZ vs. VITL — Risk / Return Rank
NUKZ
VITL
NUKZ vs. VITL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUKZ | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.80 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | -0.75 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.70 | -1.18 | +1.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUKZ vs. VITL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, smaller than the maximum VITL drawdown of -84.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and VITL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUKZ | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.03% | -84.20% | +51.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.23% | -84.20% | +65.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -84.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.23% | -73.75% | +55.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -47.81% | +41.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.83% | 53.72% | -45.89% |
Volatility
NUKZ vs. VITL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) is 6.47%, while Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a volatility of 16.40%. This indicates that NUKZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VITL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUKZ | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.47% | 16.40% | -9.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.01% | 50.11% | -27.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.55% | 63.17% | -32.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.65% | 54.54% | -21.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.65% | 53.75% | -21.10% |
Dividends
NUKZ vs. VITL - Dividend Comparison
NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, while VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.93% | 0.91% | 0.09% |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUKZ and VITL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VITL has higher volatility (16.40%) compared to NUKZ (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUKZ dropped -33.03% vs VITL's -84.20%.
NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUKZ and VITL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer