NUKZ vs. TPZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) and TPZ (Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. NUKZ is passively managed, while TPZ is actively managed. Over the past year, NUKZ returned 9.67% vs 13.35% for TPZ. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

NUKZ vs. TPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a -1.21% return, which is significantly lower than TPZ's 10.28% return.

NUKZ

• 1D: -2.49%
• 1M: -10.26%
• 6M: -10.97%
• YTD: -1.21%
• 1Y: 9.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TPZ

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 2.16%
• 6M: 7.44%
• YTD: 10.28%
• 1Y: 13.35%
• 3Y*: 25.21%
• 5Y*: 18.00%
• 10Y*: 8.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUKZ vs. TPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	-1.21%	56.57%	60.11%
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF	10.28%	5.67%	54.09%

Correlation

The correlation between NUKZ and TPZ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024	0.41

Return for Risk

NUKZ vs. TPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 16
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 15
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 17

TPZ

TPZ Risk / Return Rank: 37
TPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
TPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
TPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 30
TPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
TPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUKZ vs. TPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NUKZ	TPZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	0.97	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	1.43	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.17	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	2.13	-1.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.26	4.70	-3.44

NUKZ vs. TPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUKZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the TPZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUKZ and TPZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NUKZ vs. TPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, smaller than the maximum TPZ drawdown of -78.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and TPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUKZ	TPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.03%	-78.17%	+45.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.71%	-6.29%	-11.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.78%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.78%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-77.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.71%	-2.59%	-15.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.26%	-11.88%	+5.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.67%	2.84%	+4.83%

Volatility

NUKZ vs. TPZ - Volatility Comparison

Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) at 3.91%. This indicates that NUKZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUKZ	TPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	3.91%	+2.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.05%	10.78%	+12.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.59%	13.76%	+16.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.70%	17.69%	+15.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.70%	27.70%	+5.00%

NUKZ vs. TPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NUKZ and TPZ have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

NUKZ vs. TPZ - Dividend Comparison

NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than TPZ's 3.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.92%	0.91%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF	3.69%	3.99%	5.88%	8.99%	9.52%	4.77%	8.80%	8.84%	9.41%	7.28%	6.88%	9.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUKZ and TPZ in my portfolio?

NUKZ and TPZ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NUKZ or TPZ?

NUKZ has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to TPZ (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUKZ dropped -33.03% vs TPZ's -78.17%.

Which ETF is better, NUKZ or TPZ?

On 1-year performance, TPZ leads with 13.35% vs 9.67% for NUKZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, TPZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NUKZ or TPZ?

Over the 1-year period, TPZ has performed better with a 13.35% return vs 9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUKZ or TPZ?

NUKZ and TPZ have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUKZ or TPZ?

TPZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 0.92% for NUKZ.

What is the main difference between NUKZ and TPZ?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Tortoise.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TPZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.