TPZ vs. BKGI

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

TPZ (Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF) and BKGI (Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TPZ returned 22.25%/yr vs 21.99%/yr for BKGI. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TPZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BKGI.

Performance

TPZ vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPZ achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly lower than BKGI's 13.50% return.

TPZ

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -1.48%
• 6M: 3.90%
• YTD: 6.91%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: 22.25%
• 5Y*: 18.69%
• 10Y*: 8.30%
• ALL TIME*: 7.92%

BKGI

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 0.90%
• 6M: 8.37%
• YTD: 13.50%
• 1Y: 17.71%
• 3Y*: 21.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	$16.98M	$14.73M	$11.61M
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF	$293.05K	$219.78K	$220.84K

TPZ vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF	6.91%	5.67%	53.88%	20.72%	-1.53%
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	13.50%	37.53%	12.35%	9.72%	8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between TPZ and BKGI is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022	0.56

The correlation between TPZ and BKGI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

TPZ vs. BKGI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TPZ	BKGI
Energy	51.8%	21.1%
Utilities	43.6%	46.0%
Industrials	4.6%	11.5%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	19.0%
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

TPZ vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TPZ

TPZ Risk / Return Rank: 17
TPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
TPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
TPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 14
TPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
TPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 19

BKGI

BKGI Risk / Return Rank: 61
BKGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
BKGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BKGI Omega Ratio Rank: 56
BKGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BKGI Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TPZ vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TPZ	BKGI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.28	1.54	-1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.49	2.17	-1.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.28	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	2.89	-2.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.38	8.59	-7.21

TPZ vs. BKGI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the BKGI Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPZ and BKGI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TPZ vs. BKGI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPZ drawdown since its inception was -78.17%, which is greater than BKGI's maximum drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPZ and BKGI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPZ	BKGI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.17%	-14.79%	-63.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.63%	-6.16%	-0.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.78%	-11.37%	-6.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.57%	-2.41%	-3.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.85%	-2.54%	-9.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	2.07%	+0.92%

Volatility

TPZ vs. BKGI - Volatility Comparison

Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) at 2.79%. This indicates that TPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TPZ	BKGI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.75%	2.79%	+1.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.20%	9.52%	+1.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.15%	11.58%	+2.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.67%	13.94%	+3.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.73%	13.94%	+13.79%

TPZ vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BKGI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPZ vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison

TPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than BKGI's 2.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	2.91%	2.65%	4.55%	4.55%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF	3.49%	3.99%	5.88%	8.99%	9.52%	4.77%	8.80%	8.84%	9.41%	7.28%	6.88%	9.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPZ and BKGI in my portfolio?

TPZ and BKGI have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TPZ or BKGI?

TPZ has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to BKGI (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPZ dropped -78.17% vs BKGI's -14.79%.

Which ETF is better, TPZ or BKGI?

On 3-year performance, TPZ leads with 22.25% vs 21.99% for BKGI. On fees, BKGI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BKGI has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TPZ or BKGI?

Over the 3-year period, TPZ has performed better with a 22.25% return vs 21.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TPZ or BKGI?

BKGI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TPZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TPZ or BKGI?

TPZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.91% for BKGI.

What is the main difference between TPZ and BKGI?

They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TPZ and 0.65% for BKGI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.