PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPZ vs. GXPE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPZ vs. GXPE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPZ achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly lower than GXPE's 32.17% return.


TPZ

1D
-0.44%
1M
-1.48%
6M
3.90%
YTD
6.91%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
8.30%
ALL TIME*
7.92%

GXPE

1D
-0.48%
1M
10.34%
6M
14.12%
YTD
32.17%
1Y
40.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
36.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$33.22K$21.87K$22.78K
$293.05K$219.78K$220.84K

TPZ vs. GXPE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TPZ and GXPE is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPZ vs. GXPE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TPZ
TPZ Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

GXPE
GXPE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GXPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXPE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GXPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXPE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TPZ vs. GXPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPZGXPEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.32

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

2.57

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.38

6.79

-5.41

TPZ vs. GXPE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the GXPE Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPZ and GXPE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPZ vs. GXPE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPZ drawdown since its inception was -78.17%, which is greater than GXPE's maximum drawdown of -15.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPZ and GXPE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPZGXPEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.17%

-15.73%

-62.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-15.73%

+9.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.57%

-6.17%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.85%

-4.29%

-7.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

5.93%

-2.94%

Volatility

TPZ vs. GXPE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) is 4.75%, while Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE) has a volatility of 6.17%. This indicates that TPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GXPE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPZGXPEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

6.17%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.20%

16.68%

-5.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.15%

20.74%

-6.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.67%

20.62%

-2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.73%

20.62%

+7.11%

TPZ vs. GXPE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPZ vs. GXPE - Dividend Comparison

TPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than GXPE's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GXPE
Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF
2.11%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPZ
Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF
3.49%3.99%5.88%8.99%9.52%4.77%8.80%8.84%9.41%7.28%6.88%9.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPZ and GXPE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GXPE has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to TPZ (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPZ dropped -78.17% vs GXPE's -15.73%.

On 1-year performance, GXPE leads with 40.17% vs 3.96% for TPZ. On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TPZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GXPE has performed better with a 40.17% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TPZ.

TPZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.11% for GXPE.

TPZ is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while GXPE is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TPZ and 0.15% for GXPE.

GXPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPZ and GXPE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer