PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUKZ vs. RDVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUKZ vs. RDVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUKZ achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly higher than RDVT's -3.42% return.


NUKZ

1D
1.59%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
7.57%
6M
4.81%
1Y
28.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RDVT

1D
-1.22%
1M
21.17%
YTD
-3.42%
6M
2.14%
1Y
19.07%
3Y*
36.41%
5Y*
20.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUKZ vs. RDVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
7.57%56.57%60.11%
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
-3.42%58.63%93.07%

Correlation

The correlation between NUKZ and RDVT is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024

0.30

The correlation between NUKZ and RDVT shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUKZ vs. RDVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUKZ
NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVT
RDVT Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
RDVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVT Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUKZ vs. RDVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) and Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUKZRDVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.10

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

0.42

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.11

0.92

+3.19

NUKZ vs. RDVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUKZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the RDVT Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUKZ and RDVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUKZ vs. RDVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKZ drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, smaller than the maximum RDVT drawdown of -90.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKZ and RDVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUKZRDVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.03%

-90.17%

+57.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.51%

-42.11%

+25.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.39%

-7.44%

-2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-50.37%

+44.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.80%

18.95%

-12.15%

Volatility

NUKZ vs. RDVT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) is 11.24%, while Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) has a volatility of 14.12%. This indicates that NUKZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUKZRDVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.24%

14.12%

-2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.34%

37.55%

-14.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.46%

45.80%

-15.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.94%

49.37%

-16.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.94%

71.38%

-38.44%

Dividends

NUKZ vs. RDVT - Dividend Comparison

NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while RDVT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
0.85%0.91%0.09%
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
0.00%0.53%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUKZ and RDVT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDVT has higher volatility (14.12%) compared to NUKZ (11.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUKZ dropped -33.03% vs RDVT's -90.17%.

NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUKZ and RDVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer