NUCG.L vs. ^GSPC
NUCG.L (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NUCG.L vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUCG.L achieves a 13.00% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 7.86% return.
NUCG.L
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -5.19%
- YTD
- 13.00%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- 1Y
- 52.97%
- 3Y*
- 42.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
^GSPC
- 1D
- -2.64%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 7.86%
- 6M
- 7.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUCG.L vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NUCG.L VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF | 13.00% | 35.09% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 7.86% | 14.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUCG.L and ^GSPC is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUCG.L vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
NUCG.L
^GSPC
NUCG.L vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUCG.L | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.70 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUCG.L | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 1.91 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
NUCG.L vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUCG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.36%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -9.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUCG.L and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUCG.L | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.36% | -9.10% | -26.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.31% | -2.97% | -10.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -1.13% | -8.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.65% | — | — |
Volatility
NUCG.L vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUCG.L | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.88% | 12.19% | +27.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.92% | 12.19% | +24.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.92% | 12.19% | +24.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUCG.L and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NUCG.L and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer