^GSPC vs. TSMU
^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index, while TSMU (GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Over the past year, ^GSPC returned 20.07% vs 118.59% for TSMU. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
^GSPC vs. TSMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ^GSPC achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly lower than TSMU's 45.22% return.
^GSPC
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.09%
TSMU
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -15.84%
- 6M
- 25.27%
- YTD
- 45.22%
- 1Y
- 118.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 75.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | $37.98T | $37.61T | $41.48T |
| $5.79M | $7.14M | $6.95M |
^GSPC vs. TSMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 9.41% | 16.39% | -1.99% |
TSMU GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF | 45.22% | 74.83% | 3.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between ^GSPC and TSMU is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2024 | 0.64 |
The correlation between ^GSPC and TSMU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^GSPC vs. TSMU — Risk / Return Rank
^GSPC
TSMU
^GSPC vs. TSMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^GSPC | TSMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.24 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 2.64 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | 8.05 | +0.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^GSPC vs. TSMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^GSPC drawdown since its inception was -56.78%, smaller than the maximum TSMU drawdown of -63.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GSPC and TSMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^GSPC | TSMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.78% | -63.73% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | -40.67% | +31.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -30.97% | +29.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.70% | -16.13% | +5.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 13.35% | -11.21% |
Volatility
^GSPC vs. TSMU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) is 3.51%, while GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) has a volatility of 28.06%. This indicates that ^GSPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^GSPC | TSMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 28.06% | -24.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | 66.24% | -56.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.87% | 81.66% | -68.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 84.08% | -67.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 84.08% | -66.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
^GSPC and TSMU have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMU has higher volatility (28.06%) compared to ^GSPC (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^GSPC dropped -56.78% vs TSMU's -63.73%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ^GSPC and TSMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer