PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTST vs. QQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTST vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NTST having a 13.74% return and QQQI slightly lower at 13.43%.


NTST

1D
-1.65%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
13.74%
6M
14.00%
1Y
27.44%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*

QQQI

1D
-0.17%
1M
6.91%
YTD
13.43%
6M
12.92%
1Y
30.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTST vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NTST
NETSTREIT Corp.
13.74%31.17%-18.49%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.43%18.62%19.83%

Correlation

The correlation between NTST and QQQI is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTST vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTST
NTST Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NTST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTST Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTST Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NTST Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTST Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTST vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTSTQQQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.43

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

3.18

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.67

14.27

-8.60

NTST vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTST Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTST and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTSTQQQIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.35

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

1.34

-1.06

Drawdowns

NTST vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTST drawdown since its inception was -43.75%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTST and QQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSTQQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.75%

-20.00%

-23.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.24%

-9.61%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.69%

-0.17%

-7.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.71%

-2.20%

-17.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.85%

2.14%

+2.71%

Volatility

NTST vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 2.68%. This indicates that NTST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSTQQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

2.68%

+2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

9.85%

+3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.66%

12.98%

+5.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.26%

17.07%

+6.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.87%

17.07%

+6.80%

Dividends

NTST vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

NTST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than QQQI's 13.19% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
NTST
NETSTREIT Corp.
4.43%4.82%5.87%4.54%4.36%3.49%1.54%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.19%13.82%12.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTST and QQQI have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTST has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to QQQI (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTST dropped -43.75% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTST and QQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer