PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTR vs. STNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NTR vs. STNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) and Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTR achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than STNG's 57.90% return.


NTR

1D
1.33%
1M
0.71%
6M
11.17%
YTD
7.75%
1Y
11.02%
3Y*
6.86%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*

STNG

1D
4.03%
1M
4.14%
6M
46.43%
YTD
57.90%
1Y
79.55%
3Y*
24.33%
5Y*
34.53%
10Y*
8.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTR vs. STNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
7.75%43.33%-16.97%-20.19%0.23%60.78%5.60%5.57%-7.73%
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
57.90%6.03%-16.29%15.40%325.48%17.40%-70.74%127.09%-41.26%

Correlation

The correlation between NTR and STNG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018

0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between NTR and STNG has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NTR:

$31.41B

STNG:

$3.95B

EPS

NTR:

$4.94

STNG:

$10.16

PE Ratio

NTR:

13.24

STNG:

7.80

PEG Ratio

NTR:

0.20

STNG:

0.06

PS Ratio

NTR:

1.14

STNG:

3.78

PB Ratio

NTR:

1.25

STNG:

1.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

NTR:

$27.76B

STNG:

$1.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NTR:

$8.66B

STNG:

$536.91M

EBITDA (TTM)

NTR:

$6.33B

STNG:

$590.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTR vs. STNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTR
NTR Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

STNG
STNG Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
STNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
STNG Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
STNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
STNG Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTR vs. STNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) and Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTRSTNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.34

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

3.49

-3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.12

8.91

-7.78

NTR vs. STNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the STNG Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTR and STNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTR vs. STNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTR drawdown since its inception was -57.80%, smaller than the maximum STNG drawdown of -91.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTR and STNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTRSTNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.80%

-91.13%

+33.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.56%

-22.74%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.82%

-60.97%

+28.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.80%

-60.97%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.96%

-8.12%

-24.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.25%

-49.15%

+22.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.14%

8.90%

+1.24%

Volatility

NTR vs. STNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) is 8.92%, while Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that NTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTRSTNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.92%

12.53%

-3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.80%

28.31%

-2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.15%

38.59%

-6.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.17%

45.01%

-10.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.95%

54.21%

-20.26%

Dividends

NTR vs. STNG - Dividend Comparison

NTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than STNG's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NTR
Nutrien Ltd.
3.35%3.53%4.83%3.76%3.51%2.45%3.74%3.67%3.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
2.17%3.19%3.22%1.73%0.74%3.12%3.57%1.02%2.27%1.31%11.04%6.17%

Financials

NTR vs. STNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nutrien Ltd. and Scorpio Tankers Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
5.96B
312.86M
(NTR) Total Revenue
(STNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NTR vs. STNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nutrien Ltd. and Scorpio Tankers Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
27.2%
61.6%
Portfolio components
NTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.62B and revenue of 5.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.

STNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Scorpio Tankers Inc. reported a gross profit of 192.73M and revenue of 312.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.

NTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported an operating income of 419.11M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

STNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Scorpio Tankers Inc. reported an operating income of 153.59M and revenue of 312.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.1%.

NTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a net income of 129.19M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.

STNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Scorpio Tankers Inc. reported a net income of 216.26M and revenue of 312.86M, resulting in a net margin of 69.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NTR and STNG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STNG has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to NTR (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTR dropped -57.80% vs STNG's -91.13%.

STNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTR and STNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer