NSBRX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
NSBRX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Mar 28, 2006. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
NSBRX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NSBRX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | -2.48% | 10.03% | 17.56% | 15.08% | -9.63% | 27.17% | 9.79% | 41.88% | -4.36% | 20.07% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSBRX achieves a -2.48% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, NSBRX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 12.43%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.
NSBRX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- -2.48%
- 6M
- -2.29%
- 1Y
- 8.23%
- 3Y*
- 12.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.43%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NSBRX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSBRX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NSBRX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
NSBRX
FGIAX
NSBRX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NSBRX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.58 | 1.79 | -1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 2.30 | -1.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.36 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 2.73 | -1.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.02 | 12.62 | -8.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NSBRX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 1.79 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.80 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.58 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.42 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between NSBRX and FGIAX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NSBRX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
NSBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.20%, more than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | 9.20% | 9.26% | 6.82% | 3.01% | 3.58% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 15.68% | 7.04% | 4.57% | 1.75% | 6.24% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
NSBRX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSBRX drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSBRX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSBRX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.14% | -49.35% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -8.29% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.79% | -21.08% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.69% | -38.02% | +4.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.18% | -3.06% | -3.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -7.22% | +1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 1.79% | +0.74% |
Volatility
NSBRX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) have volatilities of 4.03% and 4.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NSBRX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 4.15% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 7.07% | +0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.11% | 12.28% | +2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.29% | 13.08% | +1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 15.17% | +1.41% |