PortfoliosLab logo
NSBRX vs. TBGVX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NSBRX and TBGVX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

NSBRX vs. TBGVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
318.74%
27.47%
NSBRX
TBGVX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NSBRX:

0.27

TBGVX:

-0.23

Sortino Ratio

NSBRX:

0.48

TBGVX:

-0.19

Omega Ratio

NSBRX:

1.07

TBGVX:

0.97

Calmar Ratio

NSBRX:

0.24

TBGVX:

-0.20

Martin Ratio

NSBRX:

0.79

TBGVX:

-0.50

Ulcer Index

NSBRX:

5.68%

TBGVX:

6.66%

Daily Std Dev

NSBRX:

16.40%

TBGVX:

14.89%

Max Drawdown

NSBRX:

-45.42%

TBGVX:

-60.59%

Current Drawdown

NSBRX:

-12.08%

TBGVX:

-9.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NSBRX achieves a -4.05% return, which is significantly lower than TBGVX's 6.81% return. Over the past 10 years, NSBRX has outperformed TBGVX with an annualized return of 6.53%, while TBGVX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.19% annualized return.


NSBRX

YTD

-4.05%

1M

-2.76%

6M

-9.91%

1Y

4.16%

5Y*

10.02%

10Y*

6.53%

TBGVX

YTD

6.81%

1M

-2.15%

6M

-4.36%

1Y

-2.95%

5Y*

5.16%

10Y*

1.19%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NSBRX vs. TBGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NSBRX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than TBGVX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for TBGVX: current value is 1.40%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
TBGVX: 1.40%
Expense ratio chart for NSBRX: current value is 0.67%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
NSBRX: 0.67%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NSBRX vs. TBGVX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NSBRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NSBRX is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NSBRX is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NSBRX is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NSBRX is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NSBRX is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NSBRX is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

TBGVX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TBGVX is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TBGVX is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TBGVX is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TBGVX is 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TBGVX is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TBGVX is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NSBRX vs. TBGVX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) and Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for NSBRX, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.00
NSBRX: 0.27
TBGVX: -0.23
The chart of Sortino ratio for NSBRX, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
NSBRX: 0.48
TBGVX: -0.19
The chart of Omega ratio for NSBRX, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
NSBRX: 1.07
TBGVX: 0.97
The chart of Calmar ratio for NSBRX, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
NSBRX: 0.24
TBGVX: -0.20
The chart of Martin ratio for NSBRX, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.00
NSBRX: 0.79
TBGVX: -0.50

The current NSBRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the TBGVX Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NSBRX and TBGVX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.27
-0.23
NSBRX
TBGVX

Dividends

NSBRX vs. TBGVX - Dividend Comparison

NSBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than TBGVX's 1.80% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NSBRX
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund
1.23%1.16%1.33%1.41%1.31%1.44%1.77%2.06%1.58%1.75%1.89%1.67%
TBGVX
Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund
1.80%1.92%1.69%1.56%1.41%0.94%1.59%1.57%1.10%1.17%0.86%1.27%

Drawdowns

NSBRX vs. TBGVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NSBRX drawdown since its inception was -45.42%, smaller than the maximum TBGVX drawdown of -60.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSBRX and TBGVX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-12.08%
-9.05%
NSBRX
TBGVX

Volatility

NSBRX vs. TBGVX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) has a higher volatility of 11.72% compared to Tweedy, Browne International Value Fund (TBGVX) at 8.75%. This indicates that NSBRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
11.72%
8.75%
NSBRX
TBGVX