NSBRX vs. DGRO
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO).
NSBRX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Mar 28, 2006. DGRO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014.
Performance
NSBRX vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NSBRX vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | -2.40% | 10.03% | 17.56% | 15.08% | -9.63% | 27.17% | 9.79% | 41.88% | -4.36% | 20.07% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.60% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NSBRX achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 1.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NSBRX having a 12.44% annualized return and DGRO not far ahead at 12.81%.
NSBRX
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -5.23%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.56%
- 1Y
- 8.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 3.88%
- 1Y
- 16.44%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 12.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NSBRX vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NSBRX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NSBRX vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
NSBRX
DGRO
NSBRX vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NSBRX | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 1.14 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.97 | 1.66 | -0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.25 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 1.48 | -0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.53 | 6.80 | -3.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NSBRX | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.14 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.74 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.77 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.73 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between NSBRX and DGRO is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NSBRX vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
NSBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%, more than DGRO's 2.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | 9.19% | 9.26% | 6.82% | 3.01% | 3.58% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 15.68% | 7.04% | 4.57% | 1.75% | 6.24% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
Drawdowns
NSBRX vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NSBRX drawdown since its inception was -45.14%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NSBRX and DGRO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NSBRX | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.14% | -35.10% | -10.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.75% | -10.92% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.79% | -19.31% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.69% | -35.10% | +1.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.10% | -4.70% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -3.48% | -1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 2.37% | +0.13% |
Volatility
NSBRX vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 3.57%. This indicates that NSBRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NSBRX | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 3.57% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 7.21% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.14% | 14.47% | +0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.29% | 13.84% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 16.63% | -0.04% |