PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRGU vs. GDXD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRGU vs. GDXD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGU achieves a 129.31% return, which is significantly higher than GDXD's -51.20% return.


NRGU

1D
2.53%
1M
-6.67%
YTD
129.31%
6M
97.01%
1Y
156.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDXD

1D
10.76%
1M
-10.12%
YTD
-51.20%
6M
-62.62%
1Y
-93.08%
3Y*
-84.24%
5Y*
-72.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRGU vs. GDXD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NRGU and GDXD is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

0.09

NRGU vs. GDXD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NRGU
GDXD

Energy

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

NRGU
100.0%
GDXD

-

Basic Materials

NRGU

-

GDXD
100.0%

Communication Services

NRGU

-

GDXD

-

Consumer Cyclical

NRGU

-

GDXD

-

Consumer Defensive

NRGU

-

GDXD

-

Financial Services

NRGU

-

GDXD

-

Healthcare

NRGU

-

GDXD

-

Industrials

NRGU

-

GDXD

-

Real Estate

NRGU

-

GDXD

-

Technology

NRGU

-

GDXD

-

Utilities

NRGU

-

GDXD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRGU vs. GDXD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXD
GDXD Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GDXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRGU vs. GDXD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NRGUGDXDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.80

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

-0.97

+4.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.88

-1.22

+11.11

NRGU vs. GDXD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRGU Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the GDXD Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRGU and GDXD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NRGUGDXDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

-0.68

+2.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

-0.67

+1.11

Drawdowns

NRGU vs. GDXD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGU drawdown since its inception was -57.50%, smaller than the maximum GDXD drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGU and GDXD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRGUGDXDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.50%

-99.96%

+42.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.95%

-96.33%

+56.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.91%

-99.93%

+79.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-71.85%

+46.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.96%

75.91%

-59.95%

Volatility

NRGU vs. GDXD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) is 31.63%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) has a volatility of 47.44%. This indicates that NRGU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRGUGDXDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.63%

47.44%

-15.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.27%

109.86%

-48.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.15%

136.25%

-61.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.15%

109.97%

-20.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.15%

109.35%

-20.20%

NRGU vs. GDXD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NRGU and GDXD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

NRGU vs. GDXD - Dividend Comparison

Neither NRGU nor GDXD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NRGU and GDXD have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXD has higher volatility (47.44%) compared to NRGU (31.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRGU dropped -57.50% vs GDXD's -99.96%.

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 156.99% vs -93.08% for GDXD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, NRGU has been the lower-risk option at 31.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 156.99% return vs -93.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NRGU and GDXD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

NRGU and GDXD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

NRGU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GDXD is Inverse Equities. NRGU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%), while GDXD tracks S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross (-300%).

NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRGU and GDXD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer