NRGD vs. HOOG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NRGD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NRGD is passively managed, while HOOG is actively managed. Over the past year, NRGD returned -80.85% vs -29.31% for HOOG. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. NRGD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HOOG.

Performance

NRGD vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGD achieves a -70.71% return, which is significantly lower than HOOG's -60.40% return.

NRGD

• 1D: -5.59%
• 1M: -6.21%
• YTD: -70.71%
• 6M: -67.28%
• 1Y: -80.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HOOG

• 1D: -12.13%
• 1M: 10.59%
• YTD: -60.40%
• 6M: -72.73%
• 1Y: -29.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRGD vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NRGD MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-70.71%	-35.30%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	-60.40%	291.44%

Correlation

The correlation between NRGD and HOOG is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025	-0.01

The correlation between NRGD and HOOG shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NRGD vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGD

NRGD Risk / Return Rank: 1
NRGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NRGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
NRGD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
NRGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
NRGD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

HOOG

HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 9
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 13
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRGD vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NRGD	HOOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.09	-0.22	-0.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.47	0.64	-3.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	1.07	-0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	-0.34	-0.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.53	-0.55	-0.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NRGD vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRGD Sharpe Ratio is -1.09, which is lower than the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRGD and HOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NRGD	HOOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.09	-0.22	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.81	0.31	-1.12

Drawdowns

NRGD vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGD drawdown since its inception was -89.64%, roughly equal to the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGD and HOOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NRGD	HOOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.64%	-86.94%	-2.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-82.88%	-86.94%	+4.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.24%	-81.53%	-7.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.88%	-37.56%	-21.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	52.87%	53.22%	-0.35%

Volatility

NRGD vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) is 29.27%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 41.51%. This indicates that NRGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NRGD	HOOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.27%	41.51%	-12.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.52%	100.64%	-42.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.26%	137.15%	-62.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	88.83%	144.88%	-56.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	88.83%	144.88%	-56.05%

NRGD vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

NRGD vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

NRGD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.07%.

Position	TTM	2025
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	31.07%	12.30%
NRGD MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NRGD and HOOG in my portfolio?

NRGD and HOOG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NRGD or HOOG?

HOOG has higher volatility (41.51%) compared to NRGD (29.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRGD dropped -89.64% vs HOOG's -86.94%.

Which ETF is better, NRGD or HOOG?

On 1-year performance, HOOG leads with -29.31% vs -80.85% for NRGD. On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NRGD has been the lower-risk option at 29.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NRGD or HOOG?

Over the 1-year period, HOOG has performed better with a -29.31% return vs -80.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NRGD or HOOG?

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NRGD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NRGD or HOOG?

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 31.07%, compared with 0.00% for NRGD.

What is the main difference between NRGD and HOOG?

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NRGD and 0.75% for HOOG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.