NRGD vs. SOXS
NRGD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and SOXS (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - NRGD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%), while SOXS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NRGD returned -80.85% vs -96.46% for SOXS. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NRGD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SOXS.
Performance
NRGD vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NRGD achieves a -76.50% return, which is significantly higher than SOXS's -91.17% return.
NRGD
- 1D
- -4.00%
- 1M
- -39.03%
- 6M
- -66.80%
- YTD
- -76.50%
- 1Y
- -80.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -72.99%
SOXS
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 20.33%
- 6M
- -85.96%
- YTD
- -91.17%
- 1Y
- -96.46%
- 3Y*
- -84.46%
- 5Y*
- -78.46%
- 10Y*
- -78.06%
- ALL TIME*
- -70.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $596.57K | $512.25K | $693.52K | |
| $3.72B | $3.43B | $3.32B |
NRGD vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NRGD MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -76.50% | -35.40% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | -91.17% | -81.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between NRGD and SOXS is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.08 |
The correlation between NRGD and SOXS shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NRGD vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank
NRGD
SOXS
NRGD vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NRGD | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 0.74 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | -0.98 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | -1.35 | -0.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NRGD vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRGD drawdown since its inception was -91.37%, smaller than the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGD and SOXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRGD | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.37% | -100.00% | +8.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.12% | -97.89% | +15.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -99.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -100.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.37% | -100.00% | +8.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.97% | -92.65% | +30.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.39% | 71.27% | -17.88% |
Volatility
NRGD vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) is 23.01%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) has a volatility of 55.41%. This indicates that NRGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NRGD | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.01% | 55.41% | -32.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.45% | 117.32% | -56.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.10% | 132.87% | -56.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.89% | 114.55% | -26.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.89% | 103.76% | -15.87% |
NRGD vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
NRGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
NRGD vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison
NRGD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRGD MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | 41.84% | 10.79% | 5.45% | 9.22% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 2.30% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NRGD and SOXS have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXS has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to NRGD (23.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRGD dropped -91.37% vs SOXS's -100.00%.
On 1-year performance, NRGD leads with -80.85% vs -96.46% for SOXS. On fees, NRGD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NRGD has been the lower-risk option at 23.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NRGD has performed better with a -80.85% return vs -96.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NRGD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.
SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 41.84%, compared with 0.00% for NRGD.
NRGD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SOXS is Inverse Equities. NRGD tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%), while SOXS tracks PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: BMO and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NRGD and 1.08% for SOXS.
SOXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.73 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NRGD and SOXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer