NPFE vs. DFND
NPFE (NPF Core Equity ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. NPFE is actively managed, while DFND is passively managed. NPFE charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.
Performance
NPFE vs. DFND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NPFE
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFND
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NPFE vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NPFE NPF Core Equity ETF | 10.08% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NPFE vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NPF Core Equity ETF (NPFE) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NPFE vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NPFE | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.02% | — | — |
Volatility
NPFE vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NPFE | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.89% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.89% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.89% | — | — |
NPFE vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison
NPFE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NPFE vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison
Neither NPFE nor DFND has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.29% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% |
NPFE NPF Core Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, NPFE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NPFE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
DFND has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for NPFE.
They also come from different issuers: NPF Investment Advisors and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for NPFE and 1.50% for DFND.
Find the right allocation for NPFE and DFND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer