NPFE vs. AFOS
NPFE (NPF Core Equity ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NPFE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
NPFE vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NPFE
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFOS
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- 24.15%
- YTD
- 31.41%
- 1Y
- 72.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NPFE vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NPFE NPF Core Equity ETF | 10.08% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 20.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between NPFE and AFOS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NPFE vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
NPFE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AFOS
NPFE vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NPF Core Equity ETF (NPFE) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NPFE | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.54 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 28.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NPFE vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NPFE drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, smaller than the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NPFE and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NPFE | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -11.52% | +6.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | -3.93% | +2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.02% | -1.52% | +0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.61% | — |
Volatility
NPFE vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NPFE | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.89% | 21.99% | -7.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 21.70% | -6.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 21.70% | -6.81% |
NPFE vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
NPFE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
NPFE vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
NPFE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.23% | 0.30% |
NPFE NPF Core Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NPFE and AFOS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NPFE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NPFE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.
AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.00% for NPFE.
They also come from different issuers: NPF Investment Advisors and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for NPFE and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for NPFE and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer