NPFE vs. AFOS

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

NPFE (NPF Core Equity ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NPFE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.

Performance

NPFE vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NPF Core Equity ETF (NPFE) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NPFE

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 0.77%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

AFOS

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -2.57%
• 6M: 16.56%
• YTD: 27.82%
• 1Y: 64.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 66.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	$478.32K	$472.43K	$519.92K
NPFE NPF Core Equity ETF	$259.33K	$255.00K	$180.28K

NPFE vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NPFE NPF Core Equity ETF	11.59%
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	16.78%

Correlation

The correlation between NPFE and AFOS is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026	0.69

Return for Risk

NPFE vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NPFE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFOS

AFOS Risk / Return Rank: 94
AFOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
AFOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AFOS Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AFOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
AFOS Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NPFE vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NPF Core Equity ETF (NPFE) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NPFE	AFOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.72	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.44	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.44	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.34	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	20.21	—

Drawdowns

NPFE vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NPFE drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, smaller than the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NPFE and AFOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	NPFE	AFOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.44%	-11.80%	+6.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.55%	+6.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.16%	-1.80%	+0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NPFE	AFOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.33%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.76%	23.16%	-8.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.76%	22.37%	-7.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.76%	22.37%	-7.61%

NPFE vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NPFE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

NPFE vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

NPFE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.

Position	TTM	2025
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	0.23%	0.30%
NPFE NPF Core Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NPFE and AFOS in my portfolio?

NPFE and AFOS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NPFE or AFOS?

On fees, NPFE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NPFE or AFOS?

NPFE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NPFE or AFOS?

AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.00% for NPFE.

What is the main difference between NPFE and AFOS?

They also come from different issuers: NPF and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for NPFE and 0.45% for AFOS.