PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NPFE vs. BUFH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NPFE vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NPF Core Equity ETF (NPFE) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NPFE

1D
-1.98%
1M
0.05%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFH

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.26%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NPFE vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NPFE and BUFH is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026

0.76

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NPFE vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NPF Core Equity ETF (NPFE) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NPFE vs. BUFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NPFEBUFHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.91

2.76

-0.86

Drawdowns

NPFE vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NPFE drawdown since its inception was -5.36%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NPFE and BUFH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NPFEBUFHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-1.53%

-3.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-0.28%

-1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

-0.18%

-0.80%

Volatility

NPFE vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NPFEBUFHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.45%

2.38%

+13.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.45%

2.38%

+13.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.45%

2.38%

+13.07%

NPFE vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NPFE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

NPFE vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

Neither NPFE nor BUFH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NPFE and BUFH have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NPFE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NPFE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

NPFE and BUFH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

NPFE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: NPF Investment Advisors and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for NPFE and 0.95% for BUFH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NPFE and BUFH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer