PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOW vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOW vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ServiceNow, Inc (NOW) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOW achieves a -30.94% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.29% return. Over the past 10 years, NOW has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 23.10%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.45% annualized return.


NOW

1D
6.57%
1M
-22.13%
YTD
-30.94%
6M
-30.94%
1Y
-47.72%
3Y*
-2.00%
5Y*
-0.84%
10Y*
23.10%

SMH

1D
-5.40%
1M
2.08%
YTD
72.29%
6M
72.29%
1Y
125.63%
3Y*
60.45%
5Y*
37.54%
10Y*
37.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOW vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOW
ServiceNow, Inc
-30.94%-27.75%50.05%81.96%-40.18%17.93%94.97%58.56%36.55%75.40%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
72.29%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between NOW and SMH is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012

0.48

The correlation between NOW and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.51 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOW vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOW
NOW Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
NOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOW Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
NOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOW Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOW vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ServiceNow, Inc (NOW) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOWSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.52

-0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

8.46

-9.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.33

29.95

-31.28

NOW vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOW Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOW and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOW vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOW drawdown since its inception was -64.54%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOW and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOWSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.54%

-84.96%

+20.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.28%

-14.93%

-45.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.54%

-35.74%

-28.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.54%

-45.30%

-19.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.54%

-45.30%

-19.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.80%

-7.24%

-47.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.94%

-40.98%

+27.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.95%

4.21%

+31.74%

Volatility

NOW vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

ServiceNow, Inc (NOW) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) have volatilities of 20.08% and 20.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOWSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.08%

20.63%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.66%

30.45%

+17.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.19%

35.83%

+16.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.92%

36.02%

+7.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.94%

33.05%

+7.89%

Dividends

NOW vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

NOW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOW
ServiceNow, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOW and SMH have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (20.63%) compared to NOW (20.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOW dropped -64.54% vs SMH's -84.96%.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOW and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer