PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOW vs. MA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NOW vs. MA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ServiceNow, Inc (NOW) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOW achieves a -26.59% return, which is significantly lower than MA's -13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, NOW has outperformed MA with an annualized return of 22.15%, while MA has yielded a comparatively lower 18.35% annualized return.


NOW

1D
-5.79%
1M
26.28%
YTD
-26.59%
6M
-34.19%
1Y
-44.75%
3Y*
0.39%
5Y*
4.07%
10Y*
22.15%

MA

1D
1.93%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
-13.70%
6M
-9.69%
1Y
-15.62%
3Y*
9.57%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
18.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOW vs. MA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOW
ServiceNow, Inc
-26.59%-27.75%50.05%81.96%-40.18%17.93%94.97%58.56%36.55%75.40%
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
-13.70%9.04%24.17%23.40%-2.66%1.16%20.19%59.16%25.31%47.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NOW and MA is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012

0.47

The correlation between NOW and MA shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NOW:

$116.95B

MA:

$438.53B

EPS

NOW:

$1.68

MA:

$17.28

PE Ratio

NOW:

66.94

MA:

28.43

PEG Ratio

NOW:

0.56

MA:

1.66

PS Ratio

NOW:

8.42

MA:

13.04

PB Ratio

NOW:

8.61

MA:

65.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

NOW:

$13.96B

MA:

$33.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NOW:

$10.69B

MA:

$26.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

NOW:

$2.80B

MA:

$21.23B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOW vs. MA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOW
NOW Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
NOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOW Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOW Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

MA
MA Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MA Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MA Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOW vs. MA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ServiceNow, Inc (NOW) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOWMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.89

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

-0.75

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.34

-1.54

+0.19

NOW vs. MA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOW Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is comparable to the MA Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOW and MA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOWMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.90

-0.71

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.28

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.68

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.83

-0.23

Drawdowns

NOW vs. MA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOW drawdown since its inception was -64.54%, roughly equal to the maximum MA drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOW and MA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOWMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.54%

-62.67%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.28%

-20.91%

-39.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.54%

-20.91%

-43.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.54%

-28.25%

-36.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.54%

-41.00%

-23.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.96%

-17.64%

-34.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.73%

-9.82%

-3.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.31%

10.19%

+23.12%

Volatility

NOW vs. MA - Volatility Comparison

ServiceNow, Inc (NOW) has a higher volatility of 25.06% compared to Mastercard Incorporated (MA) at 6.54%. This indicates that NOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOWMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.06%

6.54%

+18.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.56%

17.46%

+29.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.69%

22.23%

+27.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.39%

23.98%

+19.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.81%

26.92%

+13.89%

Dividends

NOW vs. MA - Dividend Comparison

NOW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
0.66%0.53%0.50%0.53%0.56%0.49%0.45%0.44%0.53%0.58%0.74%0.66%
NOW
ServiceNow, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NOW vs. MA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ServiceNow, Inc and Mastercard Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
3.77B
8.40B
(NOW) Total Revenue
(MA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NOW vs. MA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ServiceNow, Inc and Mastercard Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
75.1%
58.4%
Portfolio components
NOW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ServiceNow, Inc reported a gross profit of 2.83B and revenue of 3.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.1%.

MA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a gross profit of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

NOW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ServiceNow, Inc reported an operating income of 503.00M and revenue of 3.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.3%.

MA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported an operating income of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.4%.

NOW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ServiceNow, Inc reported a net income of 469.00M and revenue of 3.77B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.

MA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a net income of 3.88B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 46.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NOW and MA have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOW has higher volatility (25.06%) compared to MA (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOW dropped -64.54% vs MA's -62.67%.

MA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.71 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOW and MA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer